diversity is weakness, unity is strength radicalization of western men the radicalization of young western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable. to see this in full effect, you only have to look at the population statistics in western nations for the year 2100. https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_countries_by_future_population_ (u nited_nations, _medium_fertility_variant) in 2100, despite the ongoing effect of sub-replacement fertility, the population figures show that the population does not decrease inline with the sub-replacement fertility levels, but actually maintains and, even in many white nations, rapidly increases. what is an australian but a drunk european? no, i spent many years travelling through many, many nations. no, actual nazis do not exist.they haven ’ t been a political or social force anywhere in the world for more than 60 years. do not fret on the manner of how victory is achieved, all methods are possible, in the face of ethnic genocide, all morality is ambiguous. lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. no, people will forget my motivations quickly and only remember the attack itself. that is complicated. from where great leaders arise the men and women needed by a society in crisis are created by a greater societal group thought, they arise from their environment, from their folk, seeming springing forth from the people as if they were waiting for the moment. we must crush immigration and deport those invaders already living on our soil.

i had seen enough, and in anger, drove out of the the town, refusing to stay any longer in the cursed place and headed on to the next town. let our lives be stronger than death to fight against the enemies of the christian people. ” ask yourself, what would pope urban ii do? a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. “ what more shall i say to you? dear god no. but when europeans from all countries and continents move to back their brothers, they can not possibly attack any one group.

>a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging.