>>1194492 (last bread)

You'll be the first one coming back hat in hand apologizing for shooting your mouth off in your intemperate urge to express your disappointment and vain desire to "be the first one finished" even if you made a mistake. You don't need to post undisciplined negativity. It won't make you feel better beyond am emotional storm and is a drain on everyone else. Practice self discipline. You'll look smarter in the long run than simply rushing out to say whatever you're thinking without reflection.

>>1195069

It was as awful a thing as I've seen relating to petty abuse of beau acratic power and just general nastiness.

>>1195072

The problem with the hidden books is that they haven't been vetted and examined and held to the light of day or passed remotely the scrutiny of more accepted books. I am not saying these aren't valid but I AM saying it is a much bigger risk. They're been subjected to far fewer examinations by people learned in the times and history. Anyone can say anything, claim they mean anything, insist they are "the" truth simply because there are fewer competing opinions. People who want to reject the bible or who want to believe they are part of a "hidden" wisdom tend to flock, cult like, to these sorts of books. Again, I am not saying they aren't true because I don't know - but I do know a lot of people who haven't even seriously studied the "accepted" books rush to believe these others simply because of a bias against modern Christianity and a desire to one of those guys who has the "real" inside track.

>>1195088 Huge, if true.

>>1195102

You're filtered.

>>1195298

Why are so many people so in need of being important that they latch onto things the "less enlightened" view with skepticism. No socialist, here. And a reminder for those of us with reading comprehension, I never said the books weren't true. I said vanity leads many people to these books.