Their number uncountable, the representation of their loss unfathomable. Despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.The internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. The truth that they are rapidly becoming, not just a global minority, but a minority within their own lands. Were you taught violence and extremism by video games, music, literature, cinema? To avenge those European men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of European history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up. This should give us an indication of what may be truly at the heart of the issue. Why did you carry out the attack? VENERATE THE ANCESTORS BUT WORK FOR THE CHILDREN A soldiers fight The ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. All else is dishonorable. Yes, though not for an official policy made. I would estimate the number of soldiers in European armed forces that also belong to nationalist groups to number in the hundreds of thousands, with just as many employed in law enforcement positions.

There was a racial component to the attack. Any religious ideal that stood between the wealthy and wealth generation was downplayed, sidelined and quietly dismantled. All so that they could line their pockets without complaints or objections The nation? Does anyone even ask why? What gives a nation strength? Because they are the same issue, the environment is being destroyed by over population, we Europeans are one of the groups that are not over populating the world.

>No.