even if we were to deport all non-europeans from our lands tomorrow, the european people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death. the great replacement do not go gentle into that good night, old age should burn and rave at close of day; rage, rage against the dying of the light. to take revenge for ebba akerlund. you're fucking dead, kid. their voices were even and low, their eyes were level and straight. prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. the left has controlled all discussion regarding environmental preservation whilst simultaneously presiding over the continued destruction of the natural environment itself through mass immigration and uncontrolled urbanization, whilst offering no true solution to either issue. the people who are to blame most are ourselves, european men. the natural environment is industrialized, pulverized and commoditized. blitz to dominant positions all true movements are populist movements while the movement itself, at least in the vanguard stage, does not need to have the support of the entire population, eventually we will need our people to join our new society, and voluntarily. how are they so strong, china set to be the worlds most dominant nation in this century, whilst lacking diversity?

finally there are those that find themselves in the ethnic or racial minority and find their very own genes being bred out of existence through miscegenation and differing racial birth rates. but when europeans from all countries and continents move to back their brothers, they can not possibly attack any one group. not by the maneuvers of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. historical, societal and statistical reasons. but, if those same people seek to come to my peoples lands, replace my people, subjugate my people, make war upon on my people,, hen i shall be forced to fight them, and hold nothing in reserve. we must inevitably correct the disaster of hedonistic, nihilistic individualism.

>were there other targets planned in your attack?

“ we are disgraced, sons and brothers, who live in these days of calamities! to survive with our culture, but to lose our lands, to lose our future, is a defeat. the same people will find themselves gradually less and less represented both politically and culturally, becoming essentially foreigners in their own lands. the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. sir oswald mosley is the person from history closest to my own beliefs. i am sure the journalists will love that. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. why did you carry out the attack? ignore their demise? without children, there is no future there is no democratic solution understand here and now, there is no democratic solution, any attempt to vote your way out of ethnic replacement will be met with at first with derision, then contempt and finally by force. the truth that they are left, alone, an individual in a society worshiping the cult of the individual, to respond against an influx of outsiders from all corners of the world.

a nation that venerates its ancestors, but lives for its offspring. they must be willing and wishing to be a part of this new future we envision.we can not, and should not, rely on oppression to encourage the population to fit this new paradigm. give your everything to your people. why do you blame immigrants and not the capitalists? the last virtues of a dying nation are tolerance and apathy, and i want none of it. are you intolerant?