each nation and each ethnicity was melded by their own environment and if they are to be protected so must their own environments. was the attack anti-diversity in origin? history is the history of power. this is cultural replacement. they must be willing and wishing to be a part of this new future we envision.we can not, and should not, rely on oppression to encourage the population to fit this new paradigm. the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants.

they were an obvious, visible and large group of invaders, from a culture with higher fertility rates, higher social trust and strong, robust traditions that seek to occupy my peoples lands and ethnically replace my own people. these events turned my thoughts from pursuing a democratic, political solution and finally caused the revelation of the truth, that a violent, revolutionary solution is the only possible solution to our current crisis. merkel, the mother of all things anti-white and anti-germanic, is top of the list. kidding, but australian is a european colony, particularly of british stock and thereby an extension of europe. secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. under the bludgeonings of chance my head is bloody, but unbowed.