Anonymous ID: d4d57a Jan. 25, 2021, 3:32 a.m. No.12706264   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6298

>>12706250

>I don't recall being an alien now or in some previous incarnationโ€ฆ

 

You probably were. No big deal. Is what it is.

Why else do you think Anons and others see through things easier? Not that we're smarter (are better looking though), just seen the same stuff before.

Anonymous ID: d4d57a Jan. 25, 2021, 3:50 a.m. No.12706318   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12706298

The problem is verifying any of it. There's no science behind it here, and anything you see is almost hearsay without an implementation. If you look at a memory, I can't tell if consciously you're adding or subtracting things from it.

 

Would be a good next-level intel to have though. If by chance Anons verified a certain language or political structure outside of here, perhaps we'd be able to pin down other locations and players here.

Anonymous ID: d4d57a Jan. 25, 2021, 4:14 a.m. No.12706407   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6563

>>12706393

The idea is not based on relativity's space time, rather on the idea of ether flow.

Not that the event already exists, it's that etherically/electrically, the end point is already there. Not an absolute, but the electric force culminates at that point.

 

No different from a river meeting the ocean. You know the point of impact, but it still can be changed (eg. block the water's flow with rocks, whatever).

 

We assume this is how synchronicity works too (Seeing 11:11 for the 100th time that day). Outside electrical influences (thought, generative) pull these seeming coincidences together.