i dunno
i do my best
i got victims and shit ya know
so i gotta balance my complete
ignoring of that
straight cope
and some how tell the world exactly what to do, but that isn't to easy, i gotta tell you why i am gonna tell you what to do
it is common sense
Look what I found in common sense.
What if the pattern re-emerges.
What if America begins to choose the wise instead of the connected?
If your leaders were self-identified as people who led based on the faith?
If they are duly elected, is that illegal?
Yes. It is dangerous too.
Okay. I didn't know this. I do think you have a dictator that talks about the Lord and Jesus all the time. I dunno. Just sayin. Watch out for people like me. I am already the dictator, not much you can do lol. But yea, it gets messy. However, look Marianne Williams?
What if you had a buddhist vegan?
Someone that meditated for guidance in proper government action?
What if the President made decisions <basedin a council of trusted spiritual advisors?
Who dictates this <council>?
What if the <councildictates itself?
What if the <counciland <president> differ?
You see where the war between the wise and the wealthy begins. It goes both ways. The wise become wealthy and then they get dumb. The the dumb get wise and they get wealthy and same shit. It isn't a "wise people" or a "rich people". It is just the pattern of life. like the ingenerational reincarnation cycle.
i know you all like extra credit
If you were a someone who believed in reincarnation, do you have any control as to where you reincarnate to?
If you were living in a developing country, where would you want to reincarnate to?
Paine also attacks one type of "mixed state," the constitutional monarchy promoted by John Locke, in which the powers of government are separated between a Parliament or Congress, which makes the laws, and a monarch, who executes them. The constitutional monarchy, according to Locke, would limit the powers of the king sufficiently to ensure that the realm would remain lawful rather than easily becoming tyrannical. According to Paine, however, such limits are insufficient. In the mixed state, power tends to concentrate into the hands of the monarch, eventually permitting him to transcend any limitations placed upon him. Paine questions why the supporters of the mixed state, since they concede that the power of the monarch is dangerous, wish to include a monarch in their scheme of government in the first place.