Attention fags! Take you best shot at the dig I present here. It takes nine posts, but if I am right then we are probably days away from THE END.

The conclusion I offer will seem literally unbelievable at first… but I urge you to EXAMINE my actual reasoning and TEST it. Do my premises hold true? Do my conclusions follow from my premises? That is basic logic, which alas now probably puts you on the "no fly" list, but as long as we are still here it's our best tool, no? So line up and take a swing…

But actually come at that from another angle. We never thought POTUS would "lose" the election, right? Well, I didn't - maybe some discerned the plan. But then for two months we were absorbed in all the evidence that the fake news and the powers that be ignored. And the EVIDENCE was actually there, right: testimony from brave whistleblowers, statistical analyses from math guys, mechanical exposes from technical specialists, and maybe more. The liars and traitors and scum who control the flow of information said there was no evidence, and may they face the due penalty in short time. But of course there was evidence. The only issue was whether it adequately proved the conclusion. Most of us said YES, and so we remain and fight for TRUTH. But the scum turned their filthy souls away from the very evidence and sought to corrupt others as well. I ask that you eschew their cowardice, and consider my evidence, no matter how shocking my conclusion.

And yet, if you consider my evidence and conclusion… I suspect some may come to love and embrace it. If I am right, the trap set by POTUS and Q team is ASTOUNDING.

I am banging my head even as I write. I had a slight inkling last year and even made a post that got some replies, but I didn't pursue it. But if there is one thing POTUS taught us, it is to NEVER GIVE UP… no matter how often you screw up.

If you have are willing to follow through my next eight posts, I hope to convince you that…

.

.

.

.

Q is… Susan Rice.

(and the trap is about to spring shut)

The next two posts will present circumstantial evidence, and then I'll dive into some Q decodes that I think we all missed. What I find particular compelling is that these very different KINDS of evidence all fit together. But think for yourself.

>>12717876

(2 of 9)

I'll start with what might seem a tangential issue, but to me it is the biggest pointer to the fact that I should have paid more attention all along…

But to motivate that I'll describe my own history of thinking on DJT. I really didn't think about him at all, and if I did, I thought of him as a self-promoter up to no real good… and yet… he REALLY stood out in the Ali G video (link below). Sacha Baron Cohen is now a failed prick, but I thought Da Ali G show was great, and yet DJT is the ONE guy who doesn't "succumb" at all. I saw it and was impressed… but I didn't think it out. I didn't became a convinced fan until LATE in the 2016 game. Live and learn.

Now here's the thing with Susan Rice: her son, John David Rice-Cameron, supports Trump. Not just sorta kinda, but REALLY. (And you may know that, but just like me, maybe you didn't think it through…) He became the president of the Stanford College Republicans, and moved them decisively in the MAGA direction.

What is the "official" view at Stanford regarding Trump? (No need to answer.) Does it take intelligence and courage for a Stanford student to ACTIVELY support Donald Trump? And to try to convince others too? In one case, Rice-Cameron was assaulted by a crazed woketard and charges were filed.

Read the articles for more info. Note in particular how he helped bring Robert Spencer to campus. That's Robert Spencer, certified SPLC "Islamophobe". Wait, what? Wasn't Rice-Cameron's own mother notorious for promulgating the notion that Muslims got their feelings so hurt by a YT vid that they couldn't control themselves and had to attack the American outpost in Benghazi?

Well, perhaps Rice-Cameron rebelled against his family? Not to hear them tell it: he and his parents repeatedly say there is no tension, and that he was raised in an atmosphere that promoted freedom of thought. Can you think of any comparable case? Any child of elite parents who not only ardently supports Trump, but also discounts any suggestion of familial discord? Or does it not rather seem that children of such parents follow the safe route, accumulating fake "achievements" as they progress towards higher roles in the official game?

Think Chelsea Clinton. It may even be that Q has POINTED us towards the contrast between Chelsea and Cameron-Rice. They both went to Stanford, and Q526 even points to the fact that she married into a corrupt family. But look again at the "Our movement" video. DJT: "Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a 'sexist', a 'racist', a 'xenophobe'. They will lie, lie, lie, and then again, they will do worse than that: they will do whatever is necessary. The Clintons are criminals - remember that." When he says "worse than that", the image shows HRC lying about Benghazi. And then there is a cut to the Clintons, INCLUDING Chelsea. He is saying that SHE is a criminal too, and we should remember that.

But the juxtaposition of those two shots perhaps provides most food for thought. Susan Rice would seem to be involved in the very "worse than that"… But doesn't that make it extremely puzzling how her son breaks the mold and fights for the right and good?

Something is VERY odd here, and the more I think about it, the odder it gets.

Of course, that hardly proves that Susan Rice is a white hat, let alone that she is Q.

But this is only the second post…

sauce:

https://www.thecollegefix.com/the-conservative-leader-at-stanford-is-susan-rices-son/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/susan-rices-son-is-outspoken-pro-trump-gop-leader-at-stanford

https://stanfordpolitics.org/2018/05/28/john-rice-cameron-make-stanford-great-again-1/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/susan-rices-republican-son-allegedly-physically-assaulted-at-pro-kavanaugh-rally

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ "Our movement…"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP5ElraFHHE Ali G

>>12717897

(3 of 9)

Put Rice aside for the moment, and consider grand strategy: how might our side, the side of good, most astutely insert a deep mole into the enemy camp?

Perhaps a mole to be exposed with devastating effect at the right time?

Might it not be best to force them to believe their own lies? And especially the lies about how your life is determined by circumstances of your birth: your race, ethnicity, sex, religion, etc? They HATE freedom.

Consider AOC. I will be shocked if she is not plant, and if I do not hold the majority view, at least I am not alone.

But how does she benefit our side?

1) She charismatically says ridiculous things, sucking up attention and making the whole D party seem ridiculous.

2) She diverts her followers away from anger and violence. Perhaps an underrated point. Anyone who naively loves AOC is one less ANTIFA scumbag.

3) She drops actual truth bombs at times. She knows the real enemy. (Think: she shut down the Amazon takeover of part of NYC. Maybe you thought she was a libtard destroying jobs, but did you know then that Amazon would collude with the CHICOMS to destroy the American economy via a fake pandemic?)

But how does AOC get away with it? Because THEY are not "allowed" to criticize her. She is a young, energetic "Latina woman" on their side. By their twisted logic, they cannot debate her ideas, but must either fully accept her or cast her out as a traitor.. (as they do Tulsi).

Now step back. Suppose this makes sense in the abstract and suppose our team on the inside figured this out long ago. Who would be the best person to "plant" in such a way as to grow high into the enemy camp? A black woman? A black woman OBJECTIVELY smarter and more knowledgeable and (perhaps) more virtuous than the social climbers who surround her, and who knows it? Someone who can easily "fit in" because the "elites" who surround her are SO OBJECTIVELY STUPID that they actually believe the lies? It would be genius. It COULD happen right? But what if it DID?

What if Susan Rice is ACTUALLY Q? Hold the thought…

If that is ACTUALLY the case… then DJT has "retreated" from the White House… while LEAVING Q IN CHARGE!

In fact, Ric Grenell literally said: "She will be the shadow president."

There is more… in an interview with Maria B, she makes an understandable mistake and opens by asking him what he thinks of Rice being put in charge of foreign policy. So he corrects her: "So, Susan Rice has been tapped to do domestic policy, and what is really interesting about that is that she's got no experience in domestic policy. She is going to be somebody who is incredibly influential."

So… Rice was put in charge of domestic policy for no clear reason.

Or is the reason PATRIOTS IN CONTROL?

IF this were true, wouldn't it be genius? But perhaps Q already gave us clues that we all missed, perhaps because it just seemed too crazy?

sauce:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/grenell-susan-rice-shadow-president-biden-administration

https://youtu.be/sMjcMG5Ed3o AOC dance vid

>>12717913

(4 of 9)

Now I will start looking at the "Q evidence". The core post is Q4483, from the night of 18 June, 2020.

It shows the "blue line flag". The crucial additional piece of evidence is the fact that Susan Rice appeared on MSNBC the following morning. She was wearing a black-and-white striped shirt, and the "title bar" (sure there's an "industry" term, but not sure) was overlaid on her shirt, giving the same look as the flag from the prior night.

I am pretty sure that a link to the MSNBC page was posted on QR the next day, and got into notables. I suspect that Q team sometimes drops important items if anons don't catch them. I actually made the connection to the Q post and posted, but I never followed it up, and now I am shocked at how many other connections there are.

The very fact that the TV appearance lines up with the Q post suggests that Q could be identifying Rice as a white hat. However, if you put this together with additonal Q drops and POTUS tweets, there are so many coincidences that I think we must take seriously the evidence that Q is identifying herself as Susan Rice.

The vid posted is the Carpe Donktum vid from one of the POTUS tweets. The other vid is too large for 8kun, but you can grab it from qagg.news.

It is likely that I am missing some stuff as I am trying to put this together in a reasonble way and get it posted. Here is one curious thing I noticed: I had it in my notes that the song from the toddler vid is the Harry Connick, Jr version of (They Long to Be) Close to You, which was first recorded by The Carpenters. It turns out that Ian Cameron, the husband of Susan Rice (who is mentioned by Q and figures in a post below), had parents who ran a timber company.

sauce:

https://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-reports/watch/susan-rice-trump-administration-has-been-racist-to-its-core-85452869937

>>12717927

(5 of 9)

All three of these graphics build on the connection between Q4483 and the vid here:

https://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-reports/watch/susan-rice-trump-administration-has-been-racist-to-its-core-85452869937

See prior post especially.

So as not to be too tendentious - I am sure hardly anyone believes what I'm saying - I left out some explanation in these so you can maybe "see" for yourself.

They all hinge on the possible ambiguity of SR: might mean Seth Rich, might mean Susan Rice.

But it sure looks like Q is identifying herself as Susan Rice.

>>12717941

(6 of 9)

1 for oldfags.

2 for newfags.

>>12717951

(7 of 9)

Everything has meaning.

>>12717962

(8 of 9)

Exactly this:

>>12717973

(9 of 9)

Watch the water.