Anonymous ID: b9ced3 Jan. 27, 2021, 8:08 a.m. No.12731245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1350 >>1406 >>1522 >>1575 >>1622 >>1671 >>1703 >>1776 >>1791 >>1793 >>1819 >>1855 >>1858

GAMESTOP EXPLAINED

 

This is history Anons.

 

Bets against GameStop alone amounted to more than $2.2 billion as of Monday, FIS’ Analytics data showed, equivalent to more than a fifth of the company’s market value.

 

However, the company’s share price has quadrupled since the end of last week and added as much as 86% in early Wednesday trading to $276.

 

“Most of the short positions are funded on margins. And so when markets run against you, you are stopped out if you are a short seller,” said Kaspar Hense, a fund manager at BlueBay Asset Management, which runs $60 billion in assets.

 

“A short position can exaggerate your losses if you are not actively managing your position.”

 

Several traders have told that one of the reasons for the jump in the price of some shares is short-sellers buying back into the stock to cover potential losses the classic short-squeeze drawing in more retail investors hoping to ride the wave.

 

Retail investors’ participation in U.S. equity order flows increased to nearly 20% in 2020 from 15% in 2019, while orders from long-only funds fell to 6.4% last year from 9.7% in 2019, data from Swiss bank UBS showed.

 

Short sellers typically borrow stocks to sell with a view to buying them back later when the price falls. The premium they pay to borrow the shares reflects the demand for them.

 

All the GameStop shares that would be available to borrow are are already out on loan, with traders estimating annual borrowing costs at 25%-50% of the company’s share price.

 

Short-seller Andrew Left, who runs Citron Research and is one of the big names behind the bets against GameStop, shorted the stock when it traded around $40, expecting it to halve in value. He still has a short bet although he has covered the majority of the position at a 100% loss.

 

Melvin Capital Management also closed out a short position against GameStop at a 100% loss.

Anonymous ID: b9ced3 Jan. 27, 2021, 8:16 a.m. No.12731299   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1334

I find it hilarious that the same execs who caused the 2008 crash, who got bailed out, & who used the bail out money for executive bonuses… are now crying for regulation. The children of those people they fucked over 13 years ago, are out for blood. Ironic

Anonymous ID: b9ced3 Jan. 27, 2021, 8:25 a.m. No.12731386   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1409

MELVIN/Citron pretend to have sold & sold millions of CALLS which kill them friday!

 

ONLY reason those bastards leak, is, to drive the stock down to not be killed by friday!!

 

It's their LAST DESPERATE DIRTY trick to save billions, dont fall for it, $GME still 137% short Interest!!!

Anonymous ID: b9ced3 Jan. 27, 2021, 8:55 a.m. No.12731696   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1704

WALL STREET:

 

"I don't think anyone wins in this.

 

This is not good for our system.

 

Regulators do have to come in," says @sarat_sethi on $GME.

 

"It's becoming like a game. Las Vegas…it's going to get ugly out there.

 

As an investor I would not play in this."

 

 

https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1354391385521201152

Anonymous ID: b9ced3 Jan. 27, 2021, 8:56 a.m. No.12731704   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1728 >>1780

>>12731696

 

 

So if one group of investors (hedge funds) does something it’s ok because they are playing by a set of rules and norms that, in part, you promulgated. But if random retail cx band together to do the same thing, all of a sudden regulators need to step in?

 

Do I have that right?