they are the most despised group of invaders in the west, attacking them receives the greatest level of support. why did you choose this time to attack? this time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the east will be reaching their own zeniths of power. what nations do we have to conserve? millions of people pouring across our borders, legally.invited by the state and corporate entities to replace the white people who have failed to reproduce, failed to create the cheap labour, new consumers and tax base that the corporations and states need to thrive. unfortunately not, there was a much larger work written, roughly 240 pagies long that spoke on many issues and went into much depth, but in a moment of unbridled self criticism, i deleted the entire work and started again, two weeks before the attack itself.

venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. his death will also drive a wedge between the turk invaders currently occupying our lands and the ethnic european people whilst simultaneously weakening turkeys hold on the region, removing a prime enemy of russia and destabilizing and fracturing nato. we must be intrinsically leveraged into the political, militaristic, judicial, educational and economic institutions, and within 25 years. they built homes for their children to live in, they built communities for their people to thrive in, they built nations for their people to survive in. no, the attack was a end in itself, with all the necessary affect required. diversity is not a strength.