the end result is a nation in gridlock, unable to respond to any great change, unable to commit to any great projects. secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. over a great deal of time, from a great deal of places. nothing is conserved. the total number of people in these organizations is in the millions, the total number of groups in the thousands. were/are you a christian? they had long since lost their cities, take a look at auckland. diversity is weakness, unity is strength radicalization of western men the radicalization of young western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable. what makes you believe you are european, not just an australian? the countryside can wait, the cities need you, your youth needs you. why focus on immigration and birth rates when climate change is such a huge issue?

there is no traditionalism without environmentalism kill high profile enemies there are well known enemies of our nations, enemies of our race that freely walk through our societies, heads held high, believing themselves untouchable. all through immigration. won ’ t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from whites in the united states? i begun planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in christchurch three months in advance. some are at different stages than others but all are feeling the pressure. if we want to radically and fundamentally change society, then we need to radicalize society as much as possible.

>depending on the definition, sure.