Anonymous ID: 05ca52 Feb. 20, 2021, 6:25 a.m. No.13008287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8308 >>8319

>>13008006

Let me guess…ALL news articles, with you posting the clickbait title and link. Not to say that some news articles are relevant, but your newsfag sperging is nothing to be proud of and is more of a nuisance than not, when baking.

Anonymous ID: 05ca52 Feb. 20, 2021, 6:41 a.m. No.13008354   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8379 >>8393 >>8403

>>13008308

Every blah blah blah by news outlets is not relevent or 'notable. A news bun is more appropriate for much of these posts. Most of what you post, is either useless chatter or a clickbaitey narrative attempt. They should be viewed as such. Simply posting a title and link are not IMHO adequate. If I go to each link and ck, I will find many that have anonymous sources or are simply opinion pieces. If you posted the text in each article, it would be a lot easier to determine if notable, an article to include in a news bun (not notable per se, but interesting or tagged as a narrative trying to be set). You seem more interested in getting (you)'s than actually helping create a viable news source of notable items. When baking, the title grabs your attention, but you have to visit the link to determine if click bait, anonymously sourced, opinion, or something newsworthy. Not to mention, you never include a date. For a fact, you have posted old stuff. Not only that, you visit a news rags site, then post like 10 articles from each. Feels like being suffocated by some tricky pillow wielding mfer, while baking. I don't blaim baker so much, many are not seasoned at dealing with you. However, if not providing enough info to quickly determine validity or relevance, and bread is moving fast. I will just ignore or put in a notable bun for news chatter. The prob is though, that some of it is notable/relevant but when baking, it takes a lot of time to check. This is why gerbil and newfag bakers put every damn one of your posts in notables! Reconcile!

Anonymous ID: 05ca52 Feb. 20, 2021, 6:47 a.m. No.13008389   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13008319

Yep, fakenws didn't get famous for doing nothing. We are the news now, doesn't mean posting everything the struggling msm and gatekeeper alternatives post. Their main goal is clicks , in case you've forgotten.

Anonymous ID: 05ca52 Feb. 20, 2021, 6:54 a.m. No.13008420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8426 >>8429

>>13008393

I choose long ago to view newsfag spaz as what he is. Some of it's relevant, some of it ain't. If bread is moving fast, no time to ck, either create a news bun or ignore. No time needed to think, was just cking the newsfag, that is all. Carry on.

Anonymous ID: 05ca52 Feb. 20, 2021, 6:56 a.m. No.13008434   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13008403

Exactly. Newsfag muddies the waters (notables list), with useless/irrelevant info, which often lacks depth, relevance, and sources. IJS was checking newsfag, cuz they don't know what they did wrong. kek