I concur with that. they're back . . .
he didn't call them retards to their faces. or use it as their name or title.
so I agree with the idea that 'yes, the shills are back'.
If I go down to the hospital and ask for an abortion, even if they pass this, they will be violating their oaths and duties by giving it to me!
the law makes no sense at all.
how or why would I need a 'right to an abortion' if I am not a woman with a viable child?
so they make a law that by it's very nature is all about descrimination.
the right to NOT BE aborted is the better law.
I neer attend to the puffy drug-faced bait images of 'easy' tranny looking puffy faced horrorshow 'political' scold-shamers.
the font you use also is an automatic filter.
and no effect except revulsion to you for having posted it, fungua
shill fail
they say 'no gender'
they say 'man and women are equal'
so if I am equal I should be able to ask for an abortion even
-
if a man (but they are supposed to ignore that
-
not with child
so if they tried to preform an abortion on me they would have to be insane and also violating my rights because clearly I would be out of my head, if a man and not pregnant, to even ask for one.
but if they say 'put him on observation' they are violating my rights because they aren't supposed to ask (or even know) if I'm a man or a woman?)
so it's insane.
It seems rather tyrannical of you to keep posting that propaganda to defame this board.
more crap memes from the propaganda defamers of the board.
for me it was liberating to realize that all the graphics of lungs and arrows and 'invection' and all of that was just bullshit marketting.
you do the propagandists work.
more fake graphics, like a spell-attempt, showing colors and graphics as if it means something.
it's as meaningless as your red text.
that's what you critize about what that ssoohhole said?
that's why you shouldn't even be here, you are a pathetic pester.
looks like a typical 'make them available' and then . . . drop the charges if he dares . . . quality 'party chinese' bait girl looking.
she doesn't look hot, she looks like she pretends to be easy.
you are one hypnotized person if you thnk that her blank skewed eye look is 'hot'.
it's just the only type of woman who has ever let her self be available to you, is my guess.
-
she worked close enough to him so he could be in a position to be accused.
that's all I need to know about her.
sorry.
being anon lets people say things that they can never eer say out loud in a crowded room.
or in a forum.
of course if I met her I wouldn't base my treatment of her on a harsh assessment from a shill photo (which makes her look daffy).
that's why we are anon.
I'm not trying to hurt her feelings.
but we are all adults, supposedly, here.
and we can be honest that a lot of the people who hover towards the powerful do it for the purposes of . . . windfall.
my view , in hindsight, seems like it could be seen as a jaded point of view . . . I see only people in a place of wanting to instigate a shake down.
but it is Cuomo, who is a known . . . player of a particular sort.
and that means I don't really know, but hear the rumors.
so if those who hover close want to shake down . . .
but if she really was a doe and young and un knowing and he did something horid to her . . .
but really, my guess, a guy like that isn't going to slap the pony's ass unless he's ready to go for a ride, and that's the kind that likes to go once around, and circle back.
it's good we are anon.
and yes, there are two genders.
sorry if any ladies were offend by the bluntness of an older gentleman who does play that game.
last line should say 'an older gentledude who does NOT play that game.
I'm sure there are better images of her.
I really know nothing of her, and I would never bee so blunt and jaded if she were really here.
and maybe whatever story she's telling is real and I'm just a doushebag for saying 'Women, really? why did you even go near the guy?'
no matter what, though, really, all my grandstanding asside, no one, woman, or mens, should have to deal with being hassled at work.
and yes, girls, you ought to be able to approach good looking powerful men without thinking they are gonna wanna wanna.
no matter how sexy you are, a man (or woman) in power, at their desk or in the audience, or at lecturn, or where ever, on the job, should keep his (her) grubby hands away and not touch or sniff or be a wolf.
even if she's hypnotized and skew eyed in the moment.
he should be a gentleman at all times while performing the duties of his office.
but really, no matter what kind of woman she seems to be, a gentleman keeps the relationship professional. Even if she were known to be loose and easy, he should not be gropping around and sniffing at her or anything.
I'll let it be. I said what I felt I needed to say and then thought 'wow that's easy to misunderstand'
because I know how literal people get.
whatever her issues are, whatever he did or did not do, it is quite possible that she has a real grievance.
so let the process work out.
and my initial comment wasn't really about her, but about those who are quick to say 'oh I'd . . . her' kind of junvinile comments.
because the choice in a partner is rather important. So I said some unkind things, not really about her, but about the whole idea of the inappropriate intimate closeup (photograph).
so as far as her: obviously she felt it was important to bring the issue forward.
no one should have to face harrassment while at work or when dealing with government, or elected officials.
or is Israel fully unified with the West and at the front line of all the havoc and desolation in the world?
. . .and trying to hold it back that havoc from further havoc, heroically . . .