Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 4:54 p.m. No.13048838   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8845 >>8856

>>13048826

probably, but just playing devils advocate: we absolutely know that every single thing we're told via the media is a lie, so it could very well be totally fake.

im not in syria, as far as i can assume youre not either, how the hell do we know whats happening anywhere outside of our sphere of influence

they shoot most of the war footage in a studio anyway

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 5:15 p.m. No.13048959   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8981

>>13048932

the unfortunate thing, from a gamers perspective, is that nothing really does raiding at the level that wow does it

nothing ive tried is as complex and takes that amount of coordination as progression raiding

im pretty sure ive tried them all and nothing comes close

its sucks, ive given up on wow as well, for various reasons, but nothing ive ever played comes close to icecrown progression

however icecrown mighta been before the staff purge im not sure

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 5:17 p.m. No.13048970   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Reposting here because a LOT of you still need to see and understand this. Read OP, and read the linked response.

 

>>13048960 (Other Bread in catalog)

>>13048960 (Other Bread in catalog)

>>13048960 (Other Bread in catalog)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 5:29 p.m. No.13049031   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9049

>>13049014

ok so he came in after icecrown and from his filmography looks like he jumped right into the deep end with no ramp up, at all

thats always a tell

people dont start at the top, ever, unless their path is paved

there should be tons of random shit we've never heard of but its all triple A games and movies

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 5:45 p.m. No.13049121   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13049077

well, he definitely has talent

content i view as ambiguous, most dont, but i do

this sort of shit wakes me up to the reality of our world, most people have a different response

his intention to me is ambiguous, could be celebrating it, could be preparing the viewer

Anonymous ID: 000000 Feb. 25, 2021, 5:57 p.m. No.13049207   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9249

>>13049187

once again youve tagged the wrong tor user

its hilarious watching how hard this is for you

no wonder you people spent 3 years shilling against something that has been a norm here since infinites birth

you have no clue how to deal with it

but, am i the actual one you meant to tag?

hmmm, no way you can know

maybe this is bait as well?