dChan
Anonymous ID: 51bd81 Feb. 27, 2021, 3:51 p.m. No.13064042   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4064 >>4069 >>4378 >>4384 >>4385 >>4399 >>4402 >>4405 >>4419

"The First Arrest will Shock the World"

 

For the longest time (many months back), I thought for sure that this meant V.P. Pence.

 

My new list of candidates (in no particular order):

 

Former A.G. William Barr (e.g., obstruction of justice);

SCOTUS C.J. Roberts (child trafficking, obstruction of justice);

Nancy Pelosi (e.g., rumors her daughter's boyfriend helped organize the Jan. 06 Antifa pseudo-MAGA riot);

"President" Biden – heck, "Biden": how do we know who is there? Senile CBS interviews aside, I mean;

"Vide President" Harris (Jussie Smollett fake 'lynching': conspiracy; obstruction of justice, blah, blah).

 

No one else I can think of would "Shock the World" much, except maybe Cuomo or Newsom. But how many, say,

Koreans or Germans or Australians (Anons aside) even know who Cuomo & Newsom are?

 

What do other Anons think? Who would make a "Shocking First Arrest"? Pope Francis? Who?

Anonymous ID: 51bd81 Feb. 27, 2021, 3:59 p.m. No.13064111   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4126 >>4141 >>4142 >>4305

Steganography question (because, I am not a Cryptofag, and, no human Anon can follow every single damned bread):

 

Q repeatedly said. "You Have More Than You Know". One interpretation of this I have read in the breads over the last ~3 years, is that there might be steganographic stuff hidden in the images Q posted in his drops. About two years ago, there was a lot of chatter across about twenty or thirty breads, that this might be what (or, one of the things that) Q meant. Or not. Or, other posts (by Anons, whatever).

 

Yet, I don't recall ever seeing any Anon share/post anything about any actual discovery of any actual steganographic anything, being found anywhere, in any drop. OTOH, jobfagging and sleep and life prevent any human Anon from following every single damn bread.

 

So, were any stegano things of any kind, ever uncovered by anyone, ever, at all?

 

If not, that might be a notable false positive. If so, I would like to be pointed there so I could maybe dig more and follow up.

 

Thanks, fellow Anons.

Anonymous ID: 51bd81 Feb. 27, 2021, 4:04 p.m. No.13064167   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13064069

 

Very interesting.

 

Though: I had thought he was being saved for last? As in, you work your way up the organizational chain with the arrests, to extract maximum evidence at the bottom, about the misdeeds at the top?

 

Interesting candidate, though.

 

Thanks, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 51bd81 Feb. 27, 2021, 4:17 p.m. No.13064261   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13064173

 

I thought that would happen at the first impeachment, and later I thought at the second impeachment.

 

But, POTUS 45 testifying, or introducing evidence would (what do I know, I am not really a lawfag) have required witnesses being called, and the Impeachment Managers blinked both times.

 

But, you know … I see your point. That's a good scenario, yes.

 

Thanks, Anon.