So yes. What nations do we have to conserve? Also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically China; Turkey; India or some combination of the three. So yes. Due to the threat of ethnic replacement and our own horribly low birth rates, we do not have 150 years or even 50 years to achieve positions of power. All else is dishonorable. They see the decay all around them, plummeting, free-falling birth rates all across the Western world. Ask yourself now, are you willing to shirk your racial responsibilities? What do you encourage us to do? Until these interlopers are repatriated to their peoples lands, then Europe has no true sovereignty, and anyone, no matter their ethnicity or beliefs can call Europe their own. In this hell the individual is all and the race is worthless, something to rail against and use whenever possible, a power structure to climb, or topple.
They must be removed. So yes. This time of possible instability will also be a at a time where our potential nation enemies in the East will be reaching their own zeniths of power. My parents are of Scottish, Irish and English stock. Did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before? Were/are you a nationalist?
>But it will take take some time, time we do not have due to the crisis of mass immigration.
Best Korea Please :( give us /pol/ back or I wont stop, ya oga booga niggers
I am not Gerbil, you dummy niggers