>>1339778

so when you say disagree you mean you agree then

that handing the 5% their own personal nukes to play with might not end well

and that the babies first need a pacifier

and that Q group supercomputer is likely monitoring for a threshold that, once crossed means tech = released

and that part of our job here is to nudge people closer to that threshold of non-violence, love, peace and unity

so that we can release the tech.

I'm not saying you don't have a point.

You certainly do.

Not all the tech is so incredibly de-stabilizing.

It needs to be graded out and released in layers.

And it IS true.

that we had better see that soon.

put on the mask of loyalty and attack the anons that show a bit of doubt amirite?

gotta keep this thing from growing somehow

desperate times call for desperate measures

some of the tech is powered/controlled by your FEELINGS and EMOTIONS

why do I get the impression that some of the tech being hoarded by the cabal - they can't even USE.

actually that's pretty hilarious

the look on their face when they figured that out

anons sometimes love is tough love too

and hey —

you think maybe getting anons to friendly fire might be a good strategy?

wake up

you ever watch 2 people argue with each other

and they're saying the

SAME.

EXACT.

GODDAMN.

THING?

wakey wakey

I dunno the relevance of this, I just think it's crazy looking

>>1340250

>This petroglyph from Siberia is dated to around 5000 BCE.

don't know if that's correct or not

>>1340260

wise anon here

also remember that sometimes it's

shills attacking shills

consider that sometimes