Anonymous ID: 4f2c63 April 17, 2021, 11:28 p.m. No.13452277   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2286

>>13452263

 

They'll get a small tap on the wrist. Like JP Morgan.

 

https://goldsilverpros.com/2020/09/24/what-jp-morgans-1-billion-fine-for-manipulating-metals-could-mean-for-gold/

 

Then reap the trillions in value of the crimes and buying back at cheap rates.

Anonymous ID: 4f2c63 April 18, 2021, 12:49 a.m. No.13452554   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2562

>>13452448

 

Lots of designated shitting streets, though.

Blacks got shuffled out to Richmond when they reworked Hunters Point.

 

Heck, even East Palo Alto (named such, to piss off Palo Alto, from what I understand) has become a bit gentrified as the Faceberg people needed a place to live when Zuck built right on the bay (must be really afraid of the oceans rising to plant his headquarters directly at sea level).

Anonymous ID: 4f2c63 April 18, 2021, 12:55 a.m. No.13452578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2584 >>2600 >>2617 >>2627 >>2635 >>2659

"Facebook has elevated its office to spare it from flooding, but even with a 1.6ft rise in sea levels by the end of the century – which is towards the lower end of projections – the area around it will be inundated. Much sooner, within the coming decades, the roads leading into the complex will flood so regularly that major adaptions will be required to keep the site viable. Facebook didn’t respond to repeated requests to comment on the issue.

 

The situation is a little better for Google, located in Mountain View and also unwilling to discuss sea level rise, and Cisco, headquartered in San Jose. But should the Antarctic ice sheet disintegrate, as outlined in a recent scientific paper, seas will be pushed up beyond 6ft and swamp both businesses."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/22/silicon-valley-sea-level-rise-google-facebook-flood-risk

Anonymous ID: 4f2c63 April 18, 2021, 1:11 a.m. No.13452630   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13452603

 

I believe you. I've just been around it for about the same time. Happy to avoid it mostly. Fortunately not stuck there.

 

Thank you for adding a bit of detail to my broad strokes. Most of the anons aren't as knowledgeable about it as you must be.