>>13456433 pb
>it fully tracks the cabal
>it's just audits, not fully traceable, only for specific audits
I understand this is hard. I could break it down a little more. Besides, I'm a bit bored.
So, the crypto community monitors closely transactions that are massive in dollar amounts. They do this because, it seems, they think that tracking these movements can give away market fluctuations. In essence, the idea is that if a "whale" is investing in something, they must know something about the project or trust it to succeed. So, plenty of people watch those movements and follow them, investing along the way, hoping to pick up on the scraps.
The way that it's "not traceable" (it is, technically… you won't get away from that) is the sheer volume of different wallets interaction with a chain like Bitcoin. You aren't completely obscured, it's more like you're obscured enough to not involve data miners like advertisers or all of the banksters and faggots that insist on dipping their hands in every pie just so you can buy an energy drink or whatever.
It's obscurity by crowd, essentially. You don't stand out unless you do something really fucky.
So, now you're thinking, "but cash is so much better because no one can keep track of what I do with cash". Exactly. [They] are fully aware. How do you think they have made drug deals, buy/sell organs, launder money, etc? It's through cash…
So, we fix that fucked up interaction with the threat of a public and decentralized ledger.
The reason this isn't a problem is because of the social circumstance surrounding trade. No one will trade with you if you do fucky shit. People need to be able to see your financial history, not necessarily super easily. Sure, I want my privacy too. But, this isn't about you wanting to not be tracked by super secret spies that see you buy dildos for your gay son online, this is about you not wanting to get your data sold by facebook, having to deal with forfeiting custody of your funds to send $10 to your old aunt in Portugal, or having your bank deny a transaction because it "looks suspicious" (which is often more of a hindrance than a help).
What you don't want, however, is all of your transaction history to be secret. Please refer to the Cypherpunk Manifesto for the proper definition of "Secret" here, as well as "Private".
I think you've been confused about what you really want to be fixed. I think the reason you've been confused is that [they] want to keep their methods locked down and they also don't want you to figure out how to hinder their plans.
I get it, I want privacy too, but you're going to have to forfeit some of your privacy when you go fill up your gas tank, when you get a fix up a mortgage, when you shop for groceries. In the same vein, you have to give up some privacy when you interact with the market at large so that integrity of the ledger is maintained. Without this, you will continue to be bent over by banksters and you will have your savings drained from you so that faggots can cover up black budgets.
Please do your own research.