>democracy
Are you kidding?
We don't need Democracy.
Mob rule is unneeded. If we had rules that prevented the lowest common denominator from adding their "input" (drivel), maybe "Democracy" could have some weight.
However, until we have something like the following voting qualifications, Democracy is just a death knell:
25+
Head of household
Property owner
At least 10 year residency (in US)
Can pass a literacy test
This is how you fix what's broken with the election system you call "Democracy".
If you guys would study mythology and link clear indicators to symbolism, occult knowledge and modernized lore, you would quickly garner a deeper understanding of how these things are playing out, the kinds of ruses you're up against and how to defeat them.
It's clearly more important that a lot of totally concerned faggots what you to think.
Wait until you get to peak beneath the surface.
Most just don't know what to look for. But, believe me when I say this - the vast majority of cinema is either degenerate propaganda or disclosure on some level.
All you have to do is understand requisite material (primarily Mythology + certain esoteric viewpoints) and you will have your mind blown at all of the things that are tacitly revealed by cinematic experiences.
Who, do you suspect, is preventing you from stopping it?
Do you think no one is working to end it?
>comic books are a great resource if you are able to translate the narratives to those of classic "myth"
Someone once told me that "there are only so many stories".
If only most people could understand what those words really mean…
The things they think don't have to necessarily be untrue. They use inversions a lot, they use titles, making you think they're talking about specific people (when they're just referencing archetypes), they improperly use symbolism (or a deprecated version).
They run off on a lot of tangents, sure.
But you must understand that Syncretism actually lends one an overarching perspective that can help really break down all of the missing pieces and fit them in where there are gaps. Sure, they use some tainted reasoning or come to absurd, abstract conclusions that seem like giant leaps. I can't argue those things. But you must understand that what they're attempting to disguise demands that they obscure it by divulging it in pieces.
Your job is to put those pieces together. There are even people that will help you along the way if you show discernment and determination. Don't misunderstand, these people aren't perfect, but they at least help.
One of the first steps to unlocking these perspectives is the abandonment of dichotomy. We don't need it anymore, especially after certain points.
Links to Harris.
First bit of advice: don't ask for advice here.
Second: especially do not ask for financial advice here.
Third: Unless budgeting is null, why are you comparing a sub-$30k puchase to a $60k+ purchase? The answer is obvious.
FWIW, I like what Tesla offers, although I haven't driven one.