>>Why does Q repeatedly allude to scripture?

Because the scriptures present that there is evil within man, and that evil is satanic (an adverse spirit that is not Gods children) in origin. Too many scriptures to cite in full, but in brief, Mark 4:15, (where the Word of God is sown, Satan enters the hearts of (all) man, to steal Gods Word). Universal principle applicable to all mankind. Acts 26:18, 2 Cor. 4:4, Eph. 2:2

Jesus also tells us that evil originates internally, within everyone. There are/were no exceptions other than God Himself in the flesh. Matt. 15:19-20, Mark 7:21-23 and Matt. 5:28

Q and other investigators KNOW that satan is real, based on the evil and deception they have witnessed with their own eyes/ears within the powerful elite.

Anyone who pays attention to the world of people around them know evil is real as well. They may not connect this fact to internal evil and understand it's satanic in origin. And most will definitely NOT connect this fact to their own internal evil, not even Q or others. What Q and team are after is only what they see on the outside. The "real" perp can not be apprehended by anyone other than God. Why God created and allows this evil and evil entities are other (scriptural theodicy) questions altogether.

But the basic Q premise is scripturally SOUND. There is evil. That evil is satanic. Period, end of debate from scriptures.

And YES, we are all commanded by scripture to stand against that evil and to war with it, starting with our own selves. If we see the fact in ourselves, we'll see it much easier in others.

Q does seem to understand that this "fight" requires spiritual/scriptural guidance. And he/she is right in that sight.

>>What is unleavened bread and what does it represent?

IF any (believer) has picked up a RED LETTER Bible, they know that unleavened bread is Gods Direct Words spoken to man. The pure dope. The real stuff.

All scripture breaks down into 3 basic categories:

Gods Word and the Words of Jesus Christ. The PURE STRAIGHT TRUTH.

Then you have the words of man. This can sometimes be considered a "mixture" of many things, but basically seeing in part, knowing in part, maybe good, maybe right, maybe bad, maybe wrong, maybe evil, maybe obscured, maybe deceptive, etc etc.

And 3rd, the words of the devil and his angels. Which words often are spoken "through" various people, or sometimes straight to Gods Face, such as Jesus' encounter with the devil in the desert temptation.

These are the 3 basic categories of all scripture words. The RED LETTER Words are the easy ones to identify and categorize. The middle part is where a lot of Word students get messed up, not understanding the difference between RED LETTER and ordinary "mankind" words. And it get's trickier when trying to figure out when the devil or his messengers are speaking through mankind. But this can be sorted out through a LOT of study of the final category, satan and devil's words.

The basic primer on the later is this: Satan and his minions ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS resist and deny the RED LETTER Words of God and His Christ. That's their gig.

So, when God says, "do not murder" satan and his own "in man" MURDER. And the people who are led to do so are "tools" or in scriptural terms, "slaves" of the demonic.

This is the internal "negative" or "evil forces" that Q and team are engaged with externally, but the fact is all of us suffer internally with this condition of evil present within us. Yes, even APOSTLES. Romans 7:21.

To SEE it is to be ARMED and LOADED for warfare.

>>Who is Lucifer? Who is Moloch, Ba’al?

Believers can tend to get lost in the frying pan when trying to "categorize" various forms of demonic entities. It's really not required.

Jesus made a simple division for us. They are all one family of Satanic origin termed the devil and his messengers. And they are depicted in a vast number of ways in the scriptures, externally and allegorically and sometimes just flat out real quotes straight from the mouths of people, such as Satan speaking through Peter or devils crying out from people.

If believers haven't figured out that the Bible presents TWO entites, mankind and devils, overlapped in this current life, they are not seeing very well from the scriptural perspective.

>>Are all of the answers for us there already?

Does the future prove the past? Is scripture part of the map?

The ultimate "collision course" is unavoidable. God WILL have His Way with the devil and his messengers. That's all there is to it. When and how are the interesting parts. In thee classic "END" they will all be destroyed in the Lake of Fire.

The EXPOSING of this "internal reality' with the powerful elite is very much a part of GODS PLAN. But as this scripture line progresses, the exposure is also done unto us all as well. Glad to see God starting from the TOP DOWN. But I also know that eventually, and perhaps very quickly, it will get interesting for everyone.

>>Can you understand the 40k view without understanding the scripture?

If a person is a believer, a serious believer, they can't help but see life and the world, it's courses and ways through the presentations of Gods Words. How accurate that sight is will vary to the person. And some will never see this way in this present life. (I do not think any person is lost by God.)

Just all part of the current "drama."

"Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."

>>Why was Jesus controversial?

Still is. The Words of God and His Christ, Jesus, RILE UP and PROVOKE the devils in mankind.

This is a secure principle of the Word:

Mark 4:15.

We also know for example, from Paul, that were The Word of law is sown, it empowers or strengthens sin.

1 Corinthians 15:56

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.

And Paul shows this secure principle upon himself, in Romans 7:7-13

It's as solid as the proverbial rock of Gibraltar. Take it to the bank all day long.

That's why Jesus was controversial. Because His Words "stirred up" the RESISTANCE PARTIES in mankind. And it was the devils in man who killed Him, which of course was part of Gods Plan all along in any case.

>>Why only 4 books of Gospels in our entire bible?

According to the RCC, they are the owners of all scripture. (blah blah blah). According to the Jews, the scriptures are theirs. I am inclined to this direction, even though they were blinded by God.

The New Testament is an extension of the Old Testament in a more revealed way. The Gospels are where we find the bulk of Jesus' Direct Words and where ALL His Words are when He ministered pre death.

>>>Have lost scriptures been discovered in recent generations?

Call it luck or call it Divine Providence, but any scripture, even scripture written to this day, if in conformity with what went on prior, could be termed "scripture." The Word of God and His Ways don't change.

>>Was this predicted to occur in a certain era of humankind?

God deals with all mankind every moment. We just have difficulties in perceiving it so. Believers know the Word is alive and active.

>>What did those lost scriptures reveal?

Anyone can pop off and claim "thus sayeth the LORD." Any of us who've been around the block has seen all kinds of nonsense.

I look for "conformity" to the entirety of what we have as the basic measure of any claims, past or present. I consider the Bible as secure of an instrument of understanding that we have and all that is really necessary for life and Godliness.

>>Are some lost scriptures fabricated disinformation?

Totally. A lot of junk out there for sure. But I do think the RCC maybe got a little slap happy in cutting out texts. Considering that the material is controversial we can probably understand why they did so. But the Jews have first bids on Gods Words in any case of sights. Romans 3:2, John 4:22

>>What happened during the canonizing of the Bible?

A lot of big fights.

>>Does it remind you of how things were done throughout recent decades in DC?

I think a few folk in the first rounds of scripture battles got their tongues cut off. Would like to see that happen in DC sometime.

>>What is the very last verse of the Bible?

Why was this verse needed?

Ah, Amazing Grace…my life's blood.

>>Who would change things through translation to mislead people?

I'm a KJV fan. Most of the more modern translations have LOST the distinctive flavors necessary for understandings. Long conversation.

>>1547331

Luke 12:1

In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy

Connect

>>1547486

The Word is very much an association exercise in understandings. How often does Q do the word associations and offset direct information with slight obfuscations-associations? Often. Qdrops = crumbs. Crumbs are parts of facts, tidbits, hints, clues, partial revealings. I love the methodologies.

We both see "hypocrisy" is "leaven" from Jesus.

We see also that leaven is "bad doctrines."

There was bad doctrine from pharisees and Sadducees (not all bad, Paul claimed to still be a pharisee, post salvation, Acts 23:6)

There was bad doctrine (leaven) of Herod.

Mark 8:15

And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.

Paul also "associated" bad leaven (not saying there isn't good leaven) to glorying:

1 Corinthians 5:6

Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?

And to malice and wickedness:

1 Corinthians 5:8

Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; -

And points us to the unleavened bread of:

-but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

Unleavened bread = Sincerity and truth.

Do I think any of the statements of leaven have anything to do with physical bread and physical yeast? Nope. Not in the least.

So, yeah, interesting. And we haven't even cracked into the O.T.

I've studied allegories and associations such as the above for decades. They are vast and complex, by Divine Design.

Water associations are far more complex than leaven.

What we will find in most of these association cases is that there is both "good and bad/evil." Which is how we ourselves have been constructed by our Maker. Romans 7:21.

Therefore, when it comes to the topic of leaven = hypocrisy, if we are not sincere and truthful in seeing our "OWN" evil, we are one full step into HYPOCRISY. It's also a "lie" to say otherwise.

Sincerity and Truth. It's what's for dinner on the heavenly menu. Usually fed via a meal of humble pie. Religious people are not very fond of seeing that EVIL is present within us, but it remains a fact nevertheless.

Additionally, if we DO see this in ourselves, it is much easier seen in others, and we are far less likely to be scammed by lies and hypocrisy, particularly of the religious or political sorts.

>>1547756

It's honest, sincere and truthful to see with two eyes, both good and evil. No person is entirely one or the other.

I do sincerely believe that God Himself has bound all of us in the flesh, with (good and) evil, with the spirit of disobedience. Romans 11:32, 2 Cor. 4:4, Eph. 2:2, easy examples. Paul delineates this further in citings from Romans 9: 18-24 and 2 Tim. 2:20-21, defining this construct of "me", the individual as a vessel of honor AND a vessel of dishonor. Also shown in Gal. 4:29, Gal. 5:17 and many other places.

Paul gives us an easy test on this subject with the LAW in Romans 7:7-13, showing that the LAW of do not lust came to his MIND and therein he found "every manner" of concupiscence arose in full RESISTANCE to that law of God. That is how he concluded that EVIL was present with him in Romans 7:21, in his own mind. And this is in full accord with Jesus' Facts as well. Evil does come from within and everyone has this internal dilemma/fact to deal with. If any say they do not, they are simple liars, pawns, deceived, hypocrites, blinded by the reality of internal evil, excusing it, ignoring it, forgiving "it."

God does ask us to be sincere and truthful, and on this count, of evil being present with(in) us, that EVIL resists disclosure. Evil present with us can not be truthful. It hides, it lies, it creates every wicked thing we see on earth. That EVIL is in fact DEMONIC influence upon the ALL.

And THIS is what we are being presently shown with our LEADERS. Evil is at the TOP, the HEAD. And it's about to become UNVEILED at the TOP. That's how far we are into the "timeline" of God.

And though we may all cheer, this same revealing will also trickle down to each of us.

Trump was a sign. The sign of the "rich man accountable to no one." This type of sign bears much significance in the scriptures. This "type" of sign speaks of division, of dividing the good from the evil (see Luke 16). And that's exactly what is happening. What we are seeing is an external or fleshly sign of that dividing, the exposing of our fleshly EVIL RULERS.

The "land" is now FULL TO THE BRIM with corrupted LAW. See Paul on how LAW works. It's the power of SIN. The law comes, the internal evil RESISTS as if on autopilot.

Lawlessness and sin flourishes, just like what happened in O.T. Israel/idol worship. The "land" is defiled. They were condemned by the LAW. Their own LAW. God Given even. We know the law is for the LAWLESS, 1 Tim. 1:9. Is "evil present" lawless? Does evil present within anyone "obey" the law? Never. It's not even remotely possible. Does evil present obey God? Nope. Is evil present within us truthful, sincere? Nope. It's just a flat out liar, poser, deceiver. Anyone who paints their own evil present any other way than what it is, is in fact deceived, blinded and enslaved BY IT.

The real scriptural story is of course much deeper on this front, in the Spiritual sense.

IF and WHEN it is exposed in public, that are so called leaders are really manipulating lying pedophile devil worshipers, there is going to be a shock to the "flesh world." Part of the mask comes off. We'll see them, and it's just another step to actually seeing "our own selves" in Truth and Light. Some will see, and many will fail to see…

That we are all, both good and evil.

With LIGHT comes DIVISION.

>>1554417

Not all giants are visible. Remember the serpent who had many children, John 8:44, 1 John 3:10, none yet passed away to the second death in the LOF, who grows to a Great Red Dragon at the end, Rev. 12:3 & 9.

Were there DNA giants? I have no issues with that. It can easily be explained by "line breeding," which used to be a common practice even in dairy farming for example. You breed tall people with tall people you get progressively taller people. spoiler: They're still just people.

In Biblical studies we are advised away from genealogy (fleshly) matters. 1 Tim. 1:4 and are purposefully pointed to observe and war with the physically unseen. Eph. 6:12

>>1554531

Anyone who claims to have no sin or has not sinned or is legally obedient is under the deception of sin. 1 John 1:8, Romans 7:21, Gal. 5:17.

No person has "made themselves sinless."

There was only one sinless person, Jesus. No one else has that claim or is entitled to it.

It's an explosive subject because sin is in fact "of the devil." And usually when this is pointed out, especially to the religious, it tends to provoke the adversary's influence in the deception of the slave of sin.

IF the construction of man is good/evil, the child of God bound with the spirit of disobedience who IS NOT THEM, then the sight has to look to the obvious culprit, and not the child of God, whom all people are.

But these subject are not about people as individuals. There is no such person in the scriptures as an individual person. There are people, and satan, the devil, intermixed in their heads. Mark 4:15.

Now consider the source of resistance and apply personally.