this is a meta thread and people are posting twitter statistics as if it fucking belongs here.
if anons are too fucking stupid to realize why it doesn't belong ITT they need to be purged
aside from the problem of newfags being newfags, my only suggestion would be what i mentioned in the bread feedback thread. i think it would be easier to make a separate thread for keeping track of the things that typically go into the main general breads. the general OP can just point to it as a way to keep anons informed and up to speed. it would put slightly more work on the BO/mod team. they'd have to regularly edit the OP of that thread to reflect updated info & new Q posts. the anons who bother to read the general thread OP will see it. the anons who don't bother to read the the OP, they weren't going to see it anyway.
i'm not sure how good or bad of an idea that is. it's just an idea i think is worth considering.
>Not a bad idea anon. I'll see what I can do.
to see a more specific version of this idea, see my rant from a couple weeks ago >>38457
i've been a baker ever since then, but i'm really not that good at it (specifically seeing which posts are noteworthy). like i said, it's just an idea. use it, don't use it, use parts of it... whatever works to keep the research alive.
you can't have both, anon. either the program is dedicated to collecting and archiving EVERY Q post, or it isn't.
>>162218
the program author probably can delete it afterwards, but then it wouldn't faithfully contain EVERY Q post, would it?
for fucks sake this is a meta thread. qcodefag has jack shit to do with board moderation. take it to the general
putting this here in black & white in case people will actually read it. IMO, the delete function should remain disabled. if anons are allowed to delete their own posts, then a malicious user could do some serious damage. imagine if a baker of breads decided to go on a rampage and delete every one of his posts. he could nuke the current general thread where valuable info has been dropped. he could nuke multiple threads and all of that info is gone. right now post deletion is limited to moderator discretion, and IMO it damn sure better stay that way.
if it matters to you, the bans are still public. it's not as big of an advertisement as when the board itself was public, but it still provides an extra pointer back here.
you completely missed the point
If you have a thread that's very slow moving but you think it might have good info, maybe the owner of /qtip/ will let you keep a thread there? He only has 2 threads there now. He might even be glad to see his board put to better use.
There's a shitload of duplicates & slide threads with 0 replies in the catalog. Rather than reporting them all, I'll just make a post here.
It might also behoove anon to understand what "meta" means in the context of an image board