Anonymous ID: 9c99bc May 31, 2018, 9:29 a.m. No.1597885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7952 >>1553 >>0786 >>4360 >>8066

>>1580108

In case someone wants to dig out helper posts, clock graphics etc, it may be useful to give a small re-cap of the clocks on /qresearch/ (as found here):

→First clocks were probably drawn since Q's message on 12/18 ("Clock started - 10 days."). On /qresearch/ first images of clocks were found in #17 by spiderwebanon ( >>14813 )

→Clocks would mainly use time differences between Q posts and/or POTUS tweets, often to draw two sets of hands onto the clock (#17, >>15547 )

→Anons became creative and clock research took off around the early #20s with anons trying to connect them to Q's codes & stringers.

→Clock research was quite productive in the early #40s, to then quite suddenly die off in the late #40s.

→Research was recently revived by an anon's persistence, who over a longer period tried to direct attention to the clock, its probable starting date & how to connect the clock to a calendar >>1563625 (#1965)

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc May 31, 2018, 9:53 a.m. No.1598114   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1598105

*Not sure though if fonts will work fine, and all ….

 

>>1597952

Did go through archive.fo & qarchives.ml and local archives. Was hard enough to locate them …. but didn't feel like using tineye/googImages to try to recover the large size version. Probably the meme anons have them in their archives ….

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 1, 2018, 11 a.m. No.1608167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8337 >>8714

There's been discussion about when to start the Q-Clock (I'll leave out the running backwards part for now).

>>1603878 >>1604670 and others.

 

For a visual impression, there's three variations of the start date. All days prior to the start date (and corr. Q post markers) are painted gray.

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 1, 2018, 11:33 a.m. No.1608376   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1608337

I actually have two sets of hands implemented in the scripts already – using only one for now until I am clear how to (algorithmically) connect the two so that it makes sense, is flexible & true all the time.

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 1, 2018, 12:23 p.m. No.1608714   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8843 >>9828

>>1608337

Found time finally to pay attention >>1601339 – trying to follow the idea:

If I get it right, I would paint a calendar as in [left image, >>1608167 ] with a wonderland-style clock that has "11" instead of "1", "10" instead of "2" etc and turns around counter-clockwise ….

Then "5" would be where "7" is now, and with the Q-hiatus at [:25] as it should be. Would that be what you thought of ?

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 1, 2018, 2:39 p.m. No.1609836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9849 >>0617

>>1609784

Thinking about the stuff, just for the seconds quickly:

Should really be hard to time them accurately. After all, it's the internet and a webpage (8ch + cloudflare or such) where some server processes all user requests – so there will be delay (in the seconds range) that are out of Q team's control. One reason for me to discard seconds in the post's timestamps for now ….

Not saying though that seconds hand doesn't have a (possibly other) meaning.

 

>>1609703

Yes, had been a bit sloppy – not much "baking" involved in this first clock thread … Guess we'll have this in the next qclock bread ….

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 1, 2018, 3:01 p.m. No.1609978   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0922

>>1609860

There are quite a number of indication that forward clock/calendar & 12/07 are a match somehow: There are no Q posts where letter Q has its tail ([:25]), the pens, the 13 marker and all other things anons have found or were pointed out.

 

11/27 for a backward/mirrored clock may be interesting because it mirrors 12/07 clock with the Q post hiatus, which is at [:25] again. Also 10/28 is on the mirrored [:25] ray, and 350 days from the start (11/27) would actually be 11/11.

 

There's clear indications from the previous clock work in the early bread #20s etc, that there must be two sets of hands (and/or two clocks). If designed elegantly/correctly, one could probably use two sets of hands in a single calendar-clock.

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 3, 2018, 6:45 a.m. No.1617352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3289

>>1610925

In all clocks days with Q posts are marked blue derived from timestamps in Eastern Time.

Considering that the military frequently uses Zulu Time, and also for example >>1598102 has Q posts screenshot in GMT, it maybe be worth checking if the pattern changes around the clock, when days with Q posts are marked in GMT (i.e. UTC, ZT).

 

Nr. of days with no Q posts in each cycle:

Zulu Time (1st pic, left): 1st cycle: 26, 2nd cycle: 23, 3rd cycle (so far): 17

Eastern (2nd pic, right): 1st: 23, 2nd: 24, 3rd (so far): 17

 

Also worth noting: The first day in this 3rd cycle that Q went dead (minute hand) appears to be symmetric (around 12/[:00]) to [:13] (second hand). If Q would post again on 12/[:00], he would have had been "dead" for 13 days, or a dozen days when he'd re-appear on the 13th day…. just another funny observation ….

Anonymous ID: 9c99bc June 4, 2018, 1:08 p.m. No.1631614   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6875

>>1631180

So essentially you mean to rotate the clock by 30 deg/1 hr counterclockwise (i.e. shift it +1 hr) per cycle in the calendar, such that 12 o'clock position is not static as days go by ? Interesting.

Since a minute on the clock is a day in the calendar, one would have to rotate the clock by 6 degs every new day then ?