>>1898168

I have never posted to these boards before, but I feel the need to respond.

I was only trying to help out. I was introduced to the clock by an article on a website I read.

Given the amount of research that goes into this, I assumed that if I could write an app that would make that research easier or more efficient, it would help the movement.

Honestly, I've always used my silly name as my online identity and have never been an anon. I didn't post the app on here because until now, I hadn't even read this board.

I am a patriot trying to help. I'm not great at research, so I can't contribute much there. I was just trying to do what I am able to do as my way of contributing.

Honestly, I was completely blown away by the number of people that have showed interest in it.

Much like my shitty webpage, which I never really expected anyone to read, I never imagined more than a handful of people would care or bother to use the app.

It was out of ignorance of how this community functions that I have done things the way that I have thus far. I am not trying to get famous. I'm just trying to help.

>>1912268

Thank you for the welcome.

No, I did not create the graphic. I was sent a copy of it when I started the app. I initially had no idea where it came from. Obviously, I know now.

I do not charge money for my work. Because people were asking, I did offer the option to donate to me, but everything I have put out regarding Q is and always will be free.

The app downloads the files itself. First time you run it, it will ask for a location on your machine to save the posts and images. Select the folder where you want to store them and it will do its thing. It will take a few minutes to download it all the first time. I actually have a (shitty) video on Gab in which I download and run the app as a how to demo.

>>1912674

I'm in the process of adding an interactive clock similar to the graphic where the blue dots will be clickable to open the post windows instead of the box with a list of dates.

I would welcome any suggestions on other features that would be useful to you.

>>1913090

So, this is probably pointless… but I'm going to try because being divisive should not be how we do things.

I came here because someone pointed this page out to me because of my interest in the clock. I responded to you because you called me out.

June 8th - was not me. I will not dox that person despite how overwhelmingly obvious who they are.

As I said previously, I have always used that name as an online identity. For a long time… something like 18 years. Yes, it may be silly, but it is what it is.

I did produce the app. So yes, I smacked my bad name on it.

I never took credit for the graphic or the clock idea itself.

I'm most experienced in C#, so that was where I started the app. Eventually, I'll write it in something more universal.

I'm a programmer… nothing more. I'm by far not the best. I never claimed to be.

The version that is out now was rushed because I had a lot of life stuff to do and wanted to get it done beforehand. When I can devote some more time to making it better, I will. If you have a better version, please pass it around.

I am here because I care… I wouldn't take the time to respond if I wasn't interested in building trust.

Honestly x2… yeah, I caught that after I posted… I retyped my original response a couple of times and didn't completely proofread it afterwards. My bad.

Ordinarily, I would just ignore negativity and go about my business, but this movement is important and I felt that it was necessary to attempt a civil dialog with you.

>>1913471

I can easily roll a timestamp search into the next version.

>>1913169

The next version will have the legend. I'll start playing with tensor flow to see what I can build in with it.

I'm still on the fence about the seconds of a post's timestamp being relevant. I've seen some convincing stuff, but nailing a post to an exact second is tricky. That being said…

On the clock itself, could seconds be representative of the time of day?

Each hour on the clock represents 1,440 actual hours. (60 days * 24 hours)

Each minute on the clock represents 1,440 actual minutes. (24 hours * 60 minutes)

So, by that logic, each second on the clock would represent 1,440 seconds or 24 minutes.

That leads me to this chart.

Don't know if this might be something worth looking into, or if I am running the wrong way with it.

Thoughts?