Anonymous ID: d7864b June 9, 2018, 12:49 p.m. No.1679963   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0041 >>7349

>>1679198

Do you understand this? I don't understand any of these pictures. I kinda do? But not really?

 

My understanding thus far is I guess the easier to find keys have been found and linked, but there are occasionally small day or two deltas that make the pattern seem incorrect. I've been of the opinion that we're missing something, is this that something?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 9, 2018, 1:01 p.m. No.1680062   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1667970

holllllllyyyyyyy shitttttttt

 

Every week we need to wind the clock via some set of instructions, the wind is going ot be different. The hands are going to play out over the q posts (different way each week) or something?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 9, 2018, 1:04 p.m. No.1680092   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1680041

I get this stuff, these are just markers confirming the correct construction of the map, I'm talking about

 

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1677965.html#1678595

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1677193.html#1677420

 

I feel like they get something or are onto something, but I don't understand it.

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 9, 2018, 3:20 p.m. No.1681240   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1621

>>1680786

I'm gonna try to make a python script to wind the clock and then have a clock play out w/ HH:MM:SS and see what the hands do so we can have a live visual of this? Any suggestions of what else to include (this 'sum' thing? pulling in tweets + qposts + news?)

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 10, 2018, 2:20 p.m. No.1690669   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1690152

 

But what if it's a thing that needs to be run like a program over the q posts with the q posts as a punch card? or something?

 

i can make it do things i just need to know what things I need to be looking for?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 12, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.1717352   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7406

>>1717311

ah, nah i just was using qlcok cuz its unique.

 

I'm working on writing a program to spin around the clock and spit out stuff, this prime number hopping is really exciting though.

 

>>1682657

>>1682607

 

Specify HH:MM:SS and how each arm should tick and I can make it spit out w/e woudl be helpful. List of q dates w/ prime number time sequences? let me know!

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 2:51 p.m. No.1734477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4993

>>1727439

The time: 0:0:0

The time: 0:0:17

The time: 0:0:34

The time: 0:0:51

The time: 0:17:8

The time: 0:17:25

The time: 0:17:42

The time: 0:17:59

The time: 0:34:16

The time: 0:34:33

The time: 0:34:50

The time: 0:51:7

The time: 0:51:24

The time: 0:51:41

The time: 0:51:58

The time: 17:8:15

The time: 17:8:32

The time: 17:8:49

The time: 17:25:6

The time: 17:25:23

The time: 17:25:40

The time: 17:25:57

The time: 17:42:14

The time: 17:42:31

The time: 17:42:48

The time: 17:59:5

The time: 17:59:22

The time: 17:59:39

The time: 17:59:56

The time: 10:16:13

The time: 10:16:30

The time: 10:16:47

The time: 10:33:4

The time: 10:33:21

The time: 10:33:38

The time: 10:33:55

The time: 10:50:12

The time: 10:50:29

The time: 10:50:46

The time: 3:7:3

The time: 3:7:20

The time: 3:7:37

The time: 3:7:54

The time: 3:24:11

The time: 3:24:28

The time: 3:24:45

The time: 3:41:2

The time: 3:41:19

The time: 3:41:36

The time: 3:41:53

The time: 3:58:10

The time: 3:58:27

The time: 3:58:44

The time: 20:15:1

The time: 20:15:18

The time: 20:15:35

The time: 20:15:52

The time: 20:32:9

The time: 20:32:26

The time: 20:32:43

The time: 20:49:0

The time: 20:49:17

The time: 20:49:34

The time: 20:49:51

The time: 13:6:8

The time: 13:6:25

The time: 13:6:42

The time: 13:6:59

The time: 13:23:16

The time: 13:23:33

The time: 13:23:50

The time: 13:40:7

The time: 13:40:24

The time: 13:40:41

The time: 13:40:58

The time: 13:57:15

The time: 13:57:32

The time: 13:57:49

The time: 6:14:6

The time: 6:14:23

The time: 6:14:40

The time: 6:14:57

The time: 6:31:14

The time: 6:31:31

The time: 6:31:48

The time: 6:48:5

The time: 6:48:22

The time: 6:48:39

The time: 6:48:56

The time: 23:5:13

The time: 23:5:30

The time: 23:5:47

The time: 23:22:4

The time: 23:22:21

The time: 23:22:38

The time: 23:22:55

The time: 23:39:12

The time: 23:39:29

The time: 23:39:46

The time: 23:56:3

The time: 23:56:20

The time: 23:56:37

The time: 23:56:54

The time: 16:13:11

The time: 16:13:28

The time: 16:13:45

The time: 16:30:2

The time: 16:30:19

The time: 16:30:36

The time: 16:30:53

The time: 16:47:10

The time: 16:47:27

The time: 16:47:44

The time: 9:4:1

The time: 9:4:18

The time: 9:4:35

The time: 9:4:52

The time: 9:21:9

The time: 9:21:26

The time: 9:21:43

The time: 9:38:0

The time: 9:38:17

The time: 9:38:34

 

I don't think this is what you mean though? You mean only minutes move forward 17 at a time?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 3:34 p.m. No.1734960   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5006 >>5665 >>8985 >>1924

>>1727439

 

I may be doing something wrong, but by your calcs the next 0 hour is 2018-10-19 (which is also the 17th time the hour hand rolls over)

 

rolls 17

Date 2018-10-29 time: 0:00

AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2018-10-29

 

https://pastebin.com/Z6A9HBXM โ† full output since shit's too long

 

https://pastebin.com/MGZDDjXt โ† basic python file to recreate

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 3:40 p.m. No.1735038   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5173 >>6280

>>1735006

 

I agree there does seem to be something w/ the 17 coincidences.

 

"From Election Day, 11/8/16 to 6/9/18, which would be the last day of the 24th hour of one of our current clocks, is 578 days.

 

Halve that, and itโ€™s 289 days. Thatโ€™s 17 x 17 anons. Coincidence? "

 

I think this is super key, but I don't know how to make sense of it? is 10-29 the day? Should we be tryign to reassemble q posts in this order or something?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 4:08 p.m. No.1735397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5566

>>1735173

 

"15 minutes is 15th increment" - gets me thinking about 17 and how it's prime. Since it's a 4n+1 prime, 15 * 17 = 15 * (4n+1) = 15 since 4*15=60=0

 

17 is the largest pythagorean prime that maps to a letter of the alphabet

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 4:33 p.m. No.1735709   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5862 >>5897

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_prime

 

I have no idea if this helps, but 17 is a pythagorean prime and this looks to be about half useful

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_prime#/media/File:Paley13.svg

 

I have no idea what I'm doing though

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 4:49 p.m. No.1735973   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6122

>>1735897

 

I just learned about 4n+1 and 4n+3 primes and I think the 4n+1's are special but I forget whyโ€ฆ.

 

I guess it's cuz they're pythagorean primes? Idk the 2nd link looked relevant cuz it goes around in a circle like a clock lol

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 7:28 p.m. No.1738429   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1737527

 

The Phoenician//Viking thread also had something about the skull n bones 322. Apparently it has something to do w/ their clock and running it 5m behind? barbarian time?

 

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=SKB%20Time

 

Maybe the owl is qtime? running it 17m behind?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 7:31 p.m. No.1738479   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1736673

 

I'm actually 100% on board with you I just have no fucking clue what this is saying or how to use it.

 

I'm totally down with the idea of Q sending us a message that we can't read until some point in the future (maybe that future has already happened? We have more than we know (think logically: we have been given information (we have it) that we don't understand yet (we don't know it)))

 

I don't understand how the clock helps? I think the qclock will def be key, but I why can't I just put in a future time and then get the message now instead of having to wait?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 13, 2018, 7:48 p.m. No.1738680   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9040

Theory:

 

The only part of a Timestamp on a QPost or Presedential Tweet that matters is either the minute or second.

 

Hours will range from 0-24, which is out of phase with the 0-60 of the seconds and minutes

 

Additionally, hours are prone to timezone fuckery, it'd be harder to guarantee that everyone do the timezone conversion properly

 

I also don't think I've seen any qproofs where the hour part of the TS Matters? It's usually either a delta (in which case timezone doesn't matter because it cancels out) or the minute part. Maybe there's been a seconds part one? I can't think of any hours ones though

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 14, 2018, 11:36 a.m. No.1747291   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1747026

My bad I thought you were the other guy lol

 

https://pastebin.com/MGZDDjXt

 

That's the start of it? I've been messing around with it.

 

If you go through and look for more pastebins I made one w/ a GUI but you need to install some stuff (slightly more difficult than the usual "pip install <pkg>") to get the GUI to work. This paste is pure python that you should be able to run w/o needing anything if you're not on windows

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 14, 2018, 2:34 p.m. No.1749931   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1959 >>8066

>>1748578

I actually checked the 'official' (not sure how official) google spreadsheet of posts and 1440 lines up there also. Could also just be people ripping from qanon.pub though.

 

Did a brief analysis of Q Posts, here's the breakdown of HH : MM : SS frequencies

 

hour

TS 8 - CT 1

TS 9 - CT 1

TS 10 - CT 4

TS 5 - CT 5

TS 7 - CT 9

TS 6 - CT 11

TS 4 - CT 18

TS 3 - CT 35

TS 11 - CT 41

TS 12 - CT 63

TS 18 - CT 68

TS 16 - CT 69

TS 2 - CT 77

TS 13 - CT 78

TS 20 - CT 80

TS 17 - CT 82

TS 14 - CT 84

TS 15 - CT 85

TS 19 - CT 93

TS 21 - CT 97

TS 23 - CT 110

TS 22 - CT 115

TS 1 - CT 128

TS 0 - CT 145

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 14, 2018, 2:34 p.m. No.1749933   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

minute

TS 0 - CT 13

TS 59 - CT 13

TS 13 - CT 17

TS 35 - CT 17

TS 51 - CT 17

TS 37 - CT 18

TS 40 - CT 18

TS 14 - CT 19

TS 19 - CT 19

TS 43 - CT 19

TS 2 - CT 20

TS 8 - CT 20

TS 10 - CT 20

TS 56 - CT 20

TS 58 - CT 20

TS 55 - CT 21

TS 4 - CT 22

TS 23 - CT 22

TS 21 - CT 23

TS 26 - CT 23

TS 32 - CT 23

TS 46 - CT 23

TS 57 - CT 24

TS 7 - CT 25

TS 11 - CT 25

TS 22 - CT 25

TS 28 - CT 25

TS 34 - CT 25

TS 12 - CT 26

TS 16 - CT 26

TS 25 - CT 26

TS 31 - CT 26

TS 33 - CT 26

TS 38 - CT 26

TS 45 - CT 26

TS 49 - CT 26

TS 52 - CT 26

TS 1 - CT 27

TS 20 - CT 27

TS 24 - CT 27

TS 30 - CT 27

TS 3 - CT 28

TS 5 - CT 28

TS 17 - CT 28

TS 41 - CT 28

TS 50 - CT 28

TS 6 - CT 29

TS 53 - CT 29

TS 54 - CT 29

TS 15 - CT 30

TS 27 - CT 30

TS 42 - CT 30

TS 29 - CT 31

TS 36 - CT 31

TS 47 - CT 31

TS 18 - CT 32

TS 48 - CT 32

TS 9 - CT 34

TS 39 - CT 36

TS 44 - CT 37

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 14, 2018, 2:34 p.m. No.1749937   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

second

TS 20 - CT 13

TS 52 - CT 17

TS 5 - CT 18

TS 42 - CT 18

TS 39 - CT 19

TS 29 - CT 20

TS 35 - CT 20

TS 43 - CT 20

TS 4 - CT 21

TS 22 - CT 21

TS 49 - CT 21

TS 53 - CT 21

TS 55 - CT 21

TS 9 - CT 22

TS 13 - CT 22

TS 23 - CT 22

TS 26 - CT 22

TS 12 - CT 23

TS 16 - CT 23

TS 33 - CT 23

TS 36 - CT 23

TS 37 - CT 23

TS 50 - CT 23

TS 3 - CT 24

TS 45 - CT 24

TS 46 - CT 24

TS 54 - CT 24

TS 0 - CT 25

TS 1 - CT 25

TS 11 - CT 25

TS 28 - CT 25

TS 32 - CT 25

TS 48 - CT 25

TS 14 - CT 26

TS 15 - CT 26

TS 18 - CT 26

TS 19 - CT 26

TS 44 - CT 26

TS 10 - CT 27

TS 30 - CT 27

TS 31 - CT 27

TS 34 - CT 27

TS 47 - CT 27

TS 2 - CT 28

TS 6 - CT 28

TS 7 - CT 28

TS 17 - CT 28

TS 40 - CT 28

TS 56 - CT 28

TS 57 - CT 28

TS 51 - CT 29

TS 59 - CT 29

TS 8 - CT 30

TS 27 - CT 30

TS 24 - CT 31

TS 25 - CT 31

TS 21 - CT 32

TS 38 - CT 33

TS 41 - CT 33

TS 58 - CT 38

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 10:46 a.m. No.1760116   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0167 >>0696

>>1754505

I agree, I think I like that better than just getting rid of them.

 

Actually, that's very interesting. Right now the :MM seems to be a pretty uniformly random distribution of numbers (which in itself is telling, if every Q post is planned to the minute (which it seems to be) then they're taking efforts to not make it seem (on the surface) like there is any pattern to the :MM

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 10:49 a.m. No.1760154   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0904

>>1755009

>>1755544

 

Ya this is pretty freaking glorious

 

107 missing is a marker

 

the 107 post on patriotsfight was removed

the 107 marker in the film (dark to light) is actually missing from some versions of the same film

 

is 107 prime? I feel like it is, but that's just guess. Watch it be divisible by 13 or one of those other lameass numbers

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 12:50 p.m. No.1761268   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnDnufN-5Wo&feature=push-u-sub&attr_tag=a20JslvJqu9j2dr_-6

 

anything for us here? He says the trip was "worth every second." and I'm wondering if he's talking about the clock? My assessment is "no" but curious if anyone can see something I don't.

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 1:15 p.m. No.1761528   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1761359

>>1761430

>>1761277

 

Theory:

We have a bunch of markers, all are co-prime (i think this is the right word?) w/ 60. Why does this matter? Because the we can arrange the numbers 0-60 around the clock w/o any repeats. This is one part (the only part?) of winding the clock

 

Follow-ons:

Are there more parts to winding? Do we wind the days? (w/e April day that was :13s, is that 13s for getting the clock right, or 13s always even after we wind it?) Do the days always progress around the clock in the same manner? (I think yes?) Does the clock always progress in the same manner after being wound? (I'm going to assume yes?)

 

Do we have any hard rules yet for how to use the clock, or is it mostly just throw stuff at it and see what sticks? So far my understanding is that days that line up have related q posts, and that you can take the :MM of the date, turn that into a date, and then find some future proves past shit

 

Anyone have a better definition of the "future proves past" stuff?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 3:47 p.m. No.1763186   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3320 >>3344

>>1753054

>>1761957

 

New Q posts today link to two non-q posts, one of which violates the "107" marker (17:19 is a 'forbidden' time). I take this as an indicator that we're on the right track? At least it doesn't break that convention.

 

"When does it become mathematically impossible"

 

I forgot how to actually calculate this, (something to do w/ random variables and expected values and shit) but I can simulate it, so I just went ahead and started simulating it to see how many we shoudl roughly expect to be missing.

 

So picking times randomly [00,12):[00,60), averaging 1000 sims, we should expect the following for each corresponding number of q posts:

 

1400 posts - 102.888 missing

1464 posts (when we were given 1:07 marker) - 94.021

1500 posts (where we are now) - 89.725

 

Hopefully this is sorta helpful? I realize we really want to be able to compute given these values, how aberrant is the fact that we are missing 107 @ each value.

 

Given that there are 720 possible permutations for the time, my intuition is that being 25% off E[miss] @ observations = 2*outcomes is pretty aberrant, but statistics is always super counter-intuitive so who cares what I think.

 

TL;DR - today's q posts and analysis gives more substance to 107 being a marker

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 15, 2018, 4:16 p.m. No.1763687   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

FWIW I still think this is one of the best proofs of the utility of the qclock to date

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8jg68h/learn_to_read_the_map_future_proves_past/

 

5/14 date + news -:38s -> 3/8 date + qpost == promises made, promises kept

 

But is that the hard-fast rule? Take the date of a news story, find corresponding seconds, turn to date, find qpost?

Anonymous ID: d7864b June 18, 2018, 6:33 p.m. No.1806144   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6582 >>6584

>>1667970

>>1802509

>>1804646

 

I like this train of thought because it fits with the idea of "winding the clock" each week. The week influences the "winding"

 

can we take the times :MM modN and see if that helps? modN being "winding" the clock.

 

ideas for what N = ?

nth integer that is coprime to 60 (so [0โ€ฆ60]modN =rearranged set of [0โ€ฆ60])

where n is the week # since the first q drop. Only suggest because last week was week 23, and 107 was a magic number last week and starting from 17 it's the 25th? Which isn't exact but that's just where my head is at.

 

(1, 7, 11, 13 (I would start at 17 though, cuz Q)) 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 49, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 77, 79, 83, 89, 91, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 119, 121, 127, 131