>>1675683

>>1675702

Thanks! Will have to sleep over it for a little while. G'nite y'all magnificent Anons (pic only partially related).

>>1675729

>>1675739

It's been seen & noted.

>>1675765

lol. darn … ¬Q's around ….

>>1675782

That was along with "[1] SIG"

>>1675782

"DEFCON [1]" posted four times on 07-Jan.

>>1675814

If memory serves right, that was the signal (i.e. delta in time) to look out for in tweets/posts

>>1675935

what's fake ?

people.com/celebrity/star-tracks-wednesday-june-6-2018/

>>1676026

Doesn't do damage if some anons would at least look into it – I certainly will

>>1675967

>>1675996

The post shown is from fake Q, right and easy to recognize. But this is what also ¬Q commented yesterday to that pic (i.e. "fake and gay"). What am I missing?

>>1676119

→ >>1676078

>>1676212

Who knows? Let's see.