>>1683630 (lb)

>>1683646 (lb)

Dont know where people died for sure or if the planes were empty, but...

Planes hit towers (holograms have no associated noise following the image if I am correct?)

I heard then saw the second impact myself from a rooftop across the river..

Hijackers NAMES were NOT on the manifests of any flight. Even pre-911 you could not get a plane to take off unless you were on the list or off the plane.

The boxcutter story originated with TED OLSON's wife (barbara) who was said to called Ted and told him the plane was hijacked with boxcutters. (this call has been proven to never have happened).

Fun fact: Ted remarried mere months later to a woman who looks a helluvalot like his "dead wife" with a little plastic surgery.

>>1683687

Then what did I see with my own eyes impact the second tower that day after HEARING a jet making my look at it? whence I heard impact afterwards?

Do holograms do that dipshit?

>>1683710

The hologram (JIDF disinfo effort no doubt) really sounds like the FE shills.

>>1683732

Only a JIDF soldier would be spreading that disinfo.

I WITNESSED it, and furthermore where is your proof?

Do you know about video frame "field overlays" that cameras had back then? Whereas two fields of scanning a CCTV camera tube or chip created one frame of video, with interleaving?

LOOK it up and learn something.

OR admit you are fully sold (or selling) KIKE-rrific disinfo.

>>1683761

FE is the same shit!

-kek

>>1683746

You are a true dumbass.

CGI?

I just told you my damn EYEBALLS viewed the 2nd impact - how do my eyes get CGI which STANDS FOR:

Computer

Graphic/Generated

Image

Did they TAP MY OPTIC NERVE at the same time they broadcast it?

And what about the fucking sounds dumbass…

Grow up.

No one here is stupid enough to buy that shit.

>>1683789

You are a dumbass buying into bullshit kikery.

PERIOD

(which is easier: Real planes you control thru shit you already have, killing people you dont care about or not. OR: magnificent video fakery that has never been used since or proven to exist that comes with sound)

Serious level of dumbassery…

>>1683813

No shit!

I never claim to know if people died other than ones I saw jumping out of the building…

Yet these numbshills got proof that no planes no people no nothing except radiation or shit.

Go play with thermite, and shape charges, and ask yourself what makes sense. Videos are out there of people doing it.

The OBVIOUS makes sense.

The ridiculous comes from shills.

>>1683829

I did not have a camera, was in class.

But I did have my scanner and a laptop where I recorded all "POCSAG" pager traffic for the event.

>>1683879

>>1683835

Keyword search "Jane Stanley BBC WT7".

She (reporter jane) is standing in front of WT7 and reports it has collapsed.

Before the actual collapse happens they lose video feed.

(certainly because of the jamming aircraft that was seen circling the city with the round ufo looking antenna underneath it, all radio shit went silent during that few minutes, and I am a HAM operator so I noticed.)

>>1683945

What is MORE possible?

1. Crashing a plane with a remote controllable flight system that the CIA and Mossad had every access to.

2. the elaborate holographic scenerio with audio ability.

You decide.

>>1683890

>>1683973

My guess on the water bottles:

TWO DOWN

and however more to go (count the remaining bottles)

>>1684000

>The media controls the entire MOVIE.

They do not control what I witnessed and heard LIVE that day…

Why is that so pathetic mr smartanon shill?

your logic puts your IQ at equal to the last three digits of your post no…

>>1684020

Needs updating.

Been over a year now.

>>1684033

GOOD REMINDER:

They (putin) would kill him there.

That would be funny if soros boarded his next plane, and it just "went" to Russia…

That would be Kek in Russian!

>>1684046

I usually let nothing get to me, but that bastard did not watch people DECIDE to jump out a burning building for seconds of relief, to death onto the street and then spread lies about it.

I also want to make sure no true anon gets into that lie.

>>1684087

There was an old school video manipulator called Video Toaster from that era that could have faked the video feed(s). But not to the viewer on the street.

My memory and the video correlate, so I can attest there was no video fuckery. Just poor quality video with interleaved fields per frame that makes every other "line" of video seem to "stretch" during fast motion. Correction sometimes makes silly things happen, and this is the "wing disappearing" claim.

Digital video is a new beast, no such effects.

(I served time as a broadcast engineer)

>>1684108

>obviously notched cuts on the vertical I-beams

I remember that.

On the cover of TIME magazine I think it was…

I got ridiculed about it for years too, even being witness- my friends discount that for the official narrative. (until recently).

>>1684168

Kek!

They figured out a new form of censorship!

>>1684183

They cut at angles so the support will slide at angle. This is total proof of demolition charge.

Yes, there is drippy slag from the melt.

>>1683938

You do not have to believe me.

I am not better either way, and would split your skull with an axe and finish my whisky afterward without any regret.

But since I am here, and your remain in state of denial… We are not on the same place.

In fact you are perfectly welcome to remain a retard among the 4-6%

I want you to be proud of it.

It must take a lot of work being that stupid.

>>1684300

OR the Loretta Lynch meeting video gets released…

That is a SKY event.

>>1684324

Not to mention the http://sethrich.azurewebsites.net/

clock is got a fire emblazened "D"

with a monday trigger.

>>1684351

http://sethrich.azurewebsites.net/

>>1684375

That overlay was long enough to do much more than refuel….

Wonder who else got on/off AF1????

>>1684391

I have given it a little though, no conclusion.

Federal Informant?