>>1683586
I don't know about holograms; probably not necessary. The CGI that was used on the broadcast video was enough.
>>1683593
I bet the planes are still in service somewhere.
>>1683586
I don't know about holograms; probably not necessary. The CGI that was used on the broadcast video was enough.
>>1683593
I bet the planes are still in service somewhere.
If you are suggesting it was so magnificent that it wasn't possible, you are way behind in the technology available to the military and intelligence services when it comes to video simulation.
Does not matter what is more possible. In theory, both are possible. However, video evidence shows the use of computer generated images. I never said holograms were used. You need to add a third option: the planes were diverted, and video shown by CNN was altered.
The infamous 'plane melting into the building' shot. Impossible.