Reposting here.
13 Angry Dems on a 13-man email server.
Hussein: Barack Obama
LL: Loretta Lynch
HRC: Hillary Clinton
JC: James Comey
JC. James Clapper
CS: Chuck Schumer
AM: Andrew McCabe
We don't say his name: John McCain
RR: Rod Rosenstein
SR: Susan Rice
JB: John Brennan
HA: Huma Abedin
VJ: Valerie Jarrett
God bless you, BO.
Glad to see you're still with us.
Their desperation reached a fever pitch yesterday.
Thankfully, they're a bunch of low-energy cucks who thought they could projection their soulless, empty, nihilistic despair onto us.
Dumb bastards.
I hope you're doing well, and I hope you and all Anons have a pleasant day.
Awesome.
Same, for what it's worth, whether you could tell or not.
Not baking for now for apparent reasons, but may bake this afternoon.
Gotten nice and cozy with more reading in the meantime.
Back to lurking/reading.
An important conflict of interest to highlight.
Rod Rosenstein was responsbile for producing the redacted IG report we're seeing here.
This report includes information pertaining to the clintonemail.com server used by the "13 Angry Dems" in Q's list.
Rod Rosenstein is on this list.
Thus, Rod Rosenstein redacted his own activity on the clintonemail.com server from the report he provided to the public.
Not only would this constitute an obvious conflict of interest, removing his own activity from the report confirms that he knows that this is a conflict of interest.
Q and Anons know this, but the normies don't - not until the unredacted report comes out to confirm this.
What's the penalty for redacting your own activity and involvement in a criminal investigation from the investigative report?
He's not just talking about newfags.
He's talking about public releases of information.
The information comes well before the newfags, and if they can see that we're connecting the new public info with the old Q info we've been sitting on for months, they'll understand what's going on.
Tribal garb?