Anonymous ID: 9737d7 June 15, 2018, 6:09 a.m. No.1757598   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7607 >>7663

>>1757513

Have you ever prosecuted a criminal case before? Actually, I'll make it more difficult. Have you actually prosecuted a criminal RICO case before? If you have, then you'd know that it is a HELLUVA lot of work to join all of those defendants. To convince the judge that all are acting in concert and to keep them joined. It has to be PERFECT. Feds play for keeps. They don't bring charges unless they are convinced they will obtain a conviction. Anything else, why bother? Double jeopardy. Get it right the first time. Don't get a second chance. Don't want a mistrial either.

Anonymous ID: 9737d7 June 15, 2018, 6:22 a.m. No.1757697   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1757663

You're way the hell off target. All of these non-lawfags who read the RICO statute suddenly seem to be experts on RICO prosecutions. Joining the defendants, establishing PROBABLE CAUSE that they are all acting in concert, is more difficult than it looks. Call me a fucking shill I really don't fucking care. I'm simply trying to offer some perspective but looks like you don't want that. Hell, just ask Rudy how long it took to build a solid RICO case against the Gambino Family.