Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:19 p.m. No.2002981   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3016

>>2002949

You seem to be under the impression we're speaking about some emergency occurring and us planning to have some sort of remedy or band-aid for the ensuing economic crissis.

While this isn't exactly wrong, we're discussing GER and when in the process of NOW - END - AFTER I should be buying gold/silver.

Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:23 p.m. No.2003033   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3111 >>3163

>>2002889

oh, and is bitcoin worth it or will that crash? what about other coins?

I know you might be hesitant to give this kind of advice here, but we should be helping each other with this. I find it important that those of us who were quick to the punch on this whole Q thing should be sharing our respective knowledge with each other as it pertains to the endgame or aftergame scenario of the great awakening/revelations/etc.

Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:27 p.m. No.2003092   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3183

>>2003058

You're using the term incorrectly.

I don't come here so that people will give me advice about when or if to buy precious medals, and I certainly don't come here to ask you lot's advice on what kinds of coins to buy.

 

I don't need you or anyone else to make money. But, why the hell would I not take advice from those who watch that sector? Why would I not take that opportunity? To me, this is secondarily important, but still important enough to note and seemingly for me to take action upon.

 

I've been here for quite a long time, and don't plan on leaving with any advice I get from here. I'm here for many reasons. However, I can assure you that getting rich isn't one of them.

Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:32 p.m. No.2003159   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3348

>>2003111

>don't listen to me.

Anon, I've been where you are and struggled with the things you struggle with. This is a habbit you've got to let go of. Be more confident with what you know.

I'm sorry for acting like I know more about you than what you've let on so far, but trust this advice, please.

Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:39 p.m. No.2003246   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3283 >>3348

>>2003163

>I am also inclined to believe that Satoshi (an anon) was /ourguy/ and perhaps a Fed/Treasury anon similar to Q.

We likely aren't privy on this information for good reason.

If he wasn't a white hat himself, they were likely familiar with him and ended up helping him out.

 

Also, on the thing about structure - I sincerely believe we will see the return of the gold standard and that silver will again see wide circulation. In addition to that, it's also my estimation that once blockchain technology is seasoned we'll see a rise in circulation of various types of coins in which you'll see a prevalent theme of exclusivity following behind it wherever it travels.

 

But, as I said before, my understanding of economics is limited and we're filling up the bread talking about things that likely aren't very pertinent if at all. So, maybe we should give it a rest since our friends are working hard here and I personally don't want to devalue our work.

Anonymous ID: 5cb0f3 July 2, 2018, 3:42 p.m. No.2003277   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2003183

your suggestion is that the risk you take in investing here is whether or not the technology works out or remains relevant as opposed to whether or not the economics of the exchange of the coin itself will be able to support itself and continue to grow, correct?