Not really. More than likely be determined by the district the majoirty of the crimes were committed in, ie: his office or his home.
Anon…his plea deal says he can no longer be prosecuted for any non violent crimes he committed in DC.
then it would be determined by the charges. If it could be proven he committed them from his home, different story. But mostly he committed them at work.
Espionage is not a violent crime. His did not commit violent crimes and he can no longer be charged with non violent crimes. He was completely exonerated of any of the crimes he committed with the Congressional server. Meaning, he can never be charged with espionage or any other non violent crime he commited.
So yeah, we just got fucked either way.
You apply State's Secrets.
Fuck off idiot and read the deal he was granted.
What is so sad is anons making up shit or twisting things to make themselves believe he Awan did not just get off scot free.
Those odd pics usually show up when there is troubling news to change the narrative. That ploy works as good here as it does on MSM.
I did idiot.
Can't believe I am still having to say this. Espionage is not violent. Neither is cyber spying or stealing data. Do you not understand that? DO you not understand where those crimes were committed? Do you not understand where crimes have to be prosecuted? DO some learning before trying to correct someone else.
why don't you just fuck off.