>>3291536

maybe it's noy so much about steg - maybe it's about the connections - Guardian Project >PKHaven > Freedom of Press Foun -

>>3291607

and securedrop

Maybe JPB stood for something different than the cabal

The doc of SecureDrop assumes the Organization Hosting SecureDrop (in

this case FPF)

• The organization wants to preserve the anonymity of its sources.

• The organization acts in the interest of allowing sources to submit documents, regardless of the contents of these documents.

• The users of the system, and those with physical access to the servers, can be trusted to uphold the previous assumptions unless the entire organization has been compromised.

• The organization is prepared to push back on any and all requests to compromise the integrity of the system and its users, including requests to deanonymize sources, block document submissions, or hand over encrypted or decrypted submissions.

What if the above is assumed, but the assumption's incorrect?

Sauce https://docs.securedrop.org/en/latest/threat_model/threat_model.html

>>3396244

Thanks. Leads to the bad guys (some of them, anyway)

I think you are correct in >>3395995 re: hiding in plain sight where "people are jaded and quick to dismiss" and that the password is a simple one.

Admire you persistent Anons trying to crack the code.