Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 20, 2018, 5:13 p.m. No.2683084   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3402 >>5211 >>7055 >>9577 >>0420 >>5738

There were no updates on clock & tweets, as I was away for a while. Posting these here & now.

 

Also, I was working on another toy, which I intend to share, and hope it's useful to others too:

The long-promised application for the QClock & QPosts.

There is a folder at:

mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

which holds the source code (for win & linux), which can be compiled using Qt5.

The necessary Three-Timezone-HTML (that's the program's current database) is included as well.

 

The windows-zip also contains an exe-file, with a statically compiled version of the code โ€“ but I have no idea if it runs on any other system than mine.

I am publishing the source code at this point for all people to see that there's no malware or other shit in there, and for all to be able to conpile the code themselves โ€ฆ

 

So whoever the user of the program might be, and for whatever purpose you're here (at 8chan):

As long as you do not use it for commercial purposes (i.e. to make money or ask for donations), you can do with it whatever you want.

However, updated original versions of the program will only be found with above link โ€“ so be careful what you download, and where from โ€ฆ.

 

The program is far from finished, as you will see (last pic) โ€“ next thing to implement is to view images which were attached to posts, the thing to include after that will be a search for words/terms โ€ฆ

Posting the program as it is now, to see if the exe-file (and/or sources) run on other systems than mine, and if it is useful for others as well, since there had been requests for such a software in the past.

 

Other than that: Catching up on breads, and latest messages from around here โ€ฆ.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 20, 2018, 6 p.m. No.2683477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8328

>>2683402

Once a correct "Settings" option is established (which it is not, by now), the program will have Start/End dates choosable by the user (within useful limits, as you wouldn't want the spiral to go into inifinity or uselessly old values) โ€ฆ.

 

However, suggestions & request can be implemented in the software, if they come with a plausibly argued reason (and if that argument is deemed plausible by the developer) โ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 21, 2018, 8:02 a.m. No.2688682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9297 >>0715

>>2688328

The zip w/ the windows version has an exe file included โ€“ but I wouldn't know if it runs on your machine.

It would be interesting for me to learn if the exe runs โ€ฆ. but if you wanna be cautious about malware in the exe (there isn't, however), then it's probably safer to read the source & re-compile the code using Qt.

In case you're unfamiliar with compiling code: Also enable installation of QtCreator during Qt installation, and open the "QClockView.pro" file with QtCreator once installation has finished.

 

The preview image is just an example: In the program you can double-click on a single day that has Q posts (days marked blue), and see all posts from that day.

You can also choose to mark certain markers with these "rays" and list all posts that are along these "rays".

 

In the example I clicked on a single post (07/29 16:28:29), and clicked a button to have the timestamp of the marked post be shown in the clock (orange/yellow hands with seconds hand in red). Then I also made the program show "shared markers" for that day.

For there "rays": All systems discussed here have been implemented: That is reverse marker (e.g. [01]โ€“[31]), markers mirrored at 5:5 axis (e.g. [17]โ€“[33]) & both types of "shared markers".

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 21, 2018, 3:19 p.m. No.2693316   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3399

>>2692704

Thanks. Not posting it in the mainbread yet, since it needs some testing, and is still "in development" as can be seen.

But it could actually be useful for anyone researching Q posts offline, and clockfags probably are the ones best-suited for testing & improving the program.

Will post an updated version later tonight, as I am working one it currently.

 

It's great to hear some people build it locally (instead of relying on the developer to provide a compiled app โ€“ takes a night to compile qt statically on a slow computer โ€ฆ lol)

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 21, 2018, 3:39 p.m. No.2693649   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4687

>>2693399

Gave birth to it, so yeah, I fell in love w/ the program myself as well โ€ฆ lol โ€ฆ but it still needs a bit of work.

Not sure if I understand correctly โ€ฆ 06/22 has a single post at 17:10:04 EST (22:10:04 UTC) โ€“ I see no post on 06/23 (pic โ€“ no blue circle around 06/23)

 

However, when you switch "Q Standard Time"-zone in the program, the posts change timestamps as well โ€“ also the blue dots on the calendar.

So probably I'm misunderstanding your feature request?

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 12:13 a.m. No.2699577   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0960 >>5133 >>4886

Posting updated clocks & tweets, as usual.

Also, the folder mentioned above in >>2683084

mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

now has an updated version of the program. Posts now also show imageFileNames (if images had been posted), and double-clicking on a single day in the calendar now also marks that day visually (last pic).

 

Hope to actually have images shown in the program by tomorrow.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 7:43 a.m. No.2701453   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1856 >>1950

>>2700960

Thanks for the feedback. Looks like there is something wrong in the program when accounting for the user's local time zone:

The light yellowish hand shows the QCalendarTime (i.e. 00:00 on 12/07, 00:01 on 12/08 & 01:01 on 02/06), which should be on [:15] (i.e 04:15) for 08/19.

 

But in your program, it is on 08/18 โ€“ and all dates are shifted by one click, if you compare to the Q-Clocks in png above (also pic attached), and also it would appear as if your clock has 12/06 on [:00] instead of 12/07.

The post in your pic has original (EST) timestamps of 13:03:32, which in your pic became 08:03:32 โ€“ so it looks like I'd have to check what's going on with the conversion from user's timezone to UTC โ€ฆ. oh my โ€ฆ lol

Thanks however! With my machine's timezone being UTC I wouldn't have noticed this โ€“ wondering if others observe a similar behaviour โ€ฆ. ?

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 11:45 a.m. No.2703649   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2701856

>>2700960

>>2701950

Just uploaded an updated version which should fix the bug causing wrong timestamps.

 

So please everybody who uses the program, please update the code from above mega.nz source.

 

The function to get dates/times from strings implicitely assumed local timezone for all conversions โ€“ which screwed up things so badly.

Made the program pretty much unusable with all timestamps wrong (unless the user's machine is set to UTC).

Sorry again, hope the updated version has the problem solved.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 1:46 p.m. No.2704907   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5214

>>2704855

>Hopefully, this was the latest version.

Not sure what you mean, but yes, the link is where there's the zip files with the code.

Other than that, this is surely not the last version โ€“ still under heavy development.

 

Appreciate the feedback to help solve problems and find bugs!

 

>I choose the "One Marker Only" ray and it highlights the :18 ray

It does this because today is the [18] ray.

If you want the ray to be shown at the post you selected in the listWindow (to the upper right), then click "Timestamp -Clock" button.

That's what you mean?

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 2:16 p.m. No.2705178   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5222 >>5302

>>2705133

File qclockview_win.zip has the exe file. I think one user tried it and it ran with him.

 

Compiling it by installing Qt might not be worth the trouble as Qt is quite huge โ€ฆ

โ€ฆ but it's the safest way.

Windows zip is about 10 MB. Unzipped the executable is ~18 MB.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 22, 2018, 2:29 p.m. No.2705310   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2705214

Great to hear it's doing what it should. Thanks.

Thought about this specific behaviour of the program too โ€“ and for now decided to have two time layers (the current time & the post time) with default startup-position as current time mode, and user having to use the buttonโ€ฆ. works, if you know it, so I'm too lazy to change it โ€ฆ lol.

 

>>2705222

You can verify the genuine windows zip file after download by the sha256 checksum given in the folder's README file.

Can't guarantee that the exe runs though w/o errors though.

 

Other than that, I have compiled the exe file, and if the zip still has the exe which I had put in there, then you can be sure that I'm too stoopid (and too lazy) to put in any weird shit. Also I assume I'm known around here (& BO etc), and there's also people who can analyze code security & files much better than I could โ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 23, 2018, 1:13 p.m. No.2714886   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0956

>>2699577

The folder on mega.nz:

>mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

has an updated version which now shows images (if any) in the lower-right textwindow. So it is thumbnail versions only for now, until the button works that would open a window with a larger view.

Decided to leave image parameters (i.e both filenames, filesize & geometry) in the post for now โ€ฆ

It may be useful to take the docking window (post list & text) out of the mainwindow to have better control over window sizes when viewing images (as done in attached pic).

 

Path to images on users' local machine can be set via a click in the main menu. Images should be in a single folder and named by their hashed filenames or original filenames.

I'm assuming everyone has all images, but for those who do not have them โ€“ the ThreeTimeZone HTML (in dough above) has them all as required in a ~300 MB zip.

 

Haven't checked for new Q posts today yet โ€“ catching up on breadโ€ฆ.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 24, 2018, 7:06 a.m. No.2722278   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5535 >>5712

[8e11d0]

Having not given up dumping your useless opinions here, you poor little shit really must be thinking someone cares about your dumbass comments. Lol.

Why don't you leave? You must be the "expert" from last clock bread who was told to go fuck himselfโ€ฆ. but still you keep sucking your banana in public.

Are they paying you to shill around here? Sheesh โ€“ wonder where they get these people from โ€ฆ. even "knows" about differential equations, bahahahaha.

Please, "expert", if anyone then you are riding the dead horse around here โ€“ you must try much harder in the future. This is clearly not good enough.

Anonymous ID: d9d6a5 Aug. 25, 2018, 1:04 p.m. No.2734190   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4678 >>9126

>>2731559

Let's entertain the idea you're for real for a moment, and assume you're an anon:

How has clockfagging "really gone downhill"?

What have you done to improve this situation which you describe?

Where should it go to have an "uphill" direction again?

 

Judging from your contributions in this thread, I'd have to say that you're not very high up on my list of "high ranking anons" when it comes to clockfagging:

You're presenting us with clockImages that make little to no sense and lack any explanations of what's being done (and what to me resembles useless numberfagging mostly, e.g. >>2523383 , >>2522556 ).

Then we get some "interdasting" date related to "HILDAWG"'s arrest in 2019 ( >>2462726 ), which is wrong since 2019-02-19 is 07:19 in QCalendarTime and 2018-12-31 is 06:29 โ€“ hell, even counting forward from 11/22 (end of the clock) to 12/01 reveals that 12/02 should be at the [00]-marker.

And even when you correct yourself ( >>2463167 ) you're wrong, as 08:30 would be 510 mins after 0:00, so it would be May 1 2019.

 

Also, I can't remember reading much of your "brilliant" ideas in the last thread, while there are clearly some regulars around here, who indeed contribute useful ideas and results.

 

Generally speaking, it is the nature of posting as an anon that you cannot tell who to trust.

Thus, the only valid way is to "recognize them by their fruit" โ€“ all the while nonetheless always keeping in the back of your head that it still might be a "poisoned apple".

The number of occasions the fruit turns out to be not "poisoned" (i.e. for real, true or at least plausible within other observations) decides about the overall long-term value of the contributor.

 

Q Team is certainly aware of this problem (esp. if "NSA is running this Operation") and for this reason would not give up on anything โ€“ especially not in the thread with the people probably most dedicated to trying to figure out what's going on with the clock.

I remember the times well, when "master clockfag" was posting that table over and over again, until at first a single anon understood, then others and then even more.

This is (one way) how to communicate an important message in an environment where noone knows about the value/trustability of messages โ€ฆ.

 

So, from that point of view, [8e11d0] clearly has little to no weight so far, while for example "master clockfag" had quite some good ideas that plausibly fit into the picture and connected things apparently meaningfully.

 

I'd agree clockfagging might have gone sideways a little for the last couple of weeks or so (but surely not "downhill") โ€ฆ.

 

But then, if the clock is such an important thing to understand, where's all the anons working on it?

Why's there only 5-10 regulars here, and some others dropping stuff w/o explaining a single thing, much less trying to make it plausible to others?

Where's the autists you mention who "have quietly been building the map"?

Why are they not here communicating how to do it, so that others can reproduce it and see for themselves if it makes sense or is plausible?

Instead of helping to counter "the clown's diversion" by delivering plausible ideas or results, why are you โ€“ in a generally not trustable environment โ€“ bitching around in the only thread dedicated to trying to figure out the clock โ€ฆ a thread with anons that have delivered quite some results in the past?

 

Just saying โ€ฆ >>2733316 ("master clockfag" assumably) is not wrong when asking about "clowns": "ever wonder why they started coming around?" [why & when that would be] โ€ฆ

 

If Q Team thought we'd be so much off the rails and it'd go all "downhill", then they would find a way โ€“ even in such an environment, and even with "dedicated shills" around, who also may be intelligent.

But I think it would be unlikely they chose to do so by calling us "shills" and bitching around w/o contributing (or helping) usefully โ€ฆ.