Here's my editing contribution. Had one ready last week and then technical issues prevented my posting; glad to see some of the edits I did then have already been addressed. For me (and anons/patriots in general?!) the best part is your ending!!!
Sorry- that third slash should have been deleted, leaving the following:
4chan, /cbts/, on November….
Yes - when you have a long list of disparate "objects", they should be separated by semi-colons rather than commas.
Thank YOU - you're doing all the heavy lifting! It's a privilege to participate even in a small way. It is important for the form not to get in the way of the message, but to promote or even enhance it if possible; kudos to you for your humble and generous recognition of that!
¶1: …but an information operation and truth-seeking movement that wants
to peacefully help President Trump Make America Great Again.
Whoops… misc. words left out but
it's late and you must be exhausted. I can copy edit with fresh eyes again in the a.m. and send doc tomorrow?
Yep, that's what I started reading through, started to post edits, and then realized there's too much for tonight! I can't pull all-nighters ( or even late-nighters!) any more!
Here you go, plus an edit of last night's "draft saved" page.
>>Yes- last night's pastabin
Thanks!
Check near the end of the first para.; "someone" was left out and replaced with "appear" (Knowing the answers to these basic questions, appear curious about or just starting to learn about Q, can further his or her understanding by reading more crumbs and viewing more graphics. )
Also check Part III para. 1: The Hunt for Red October (should be italicized) whenrein (sp = wherein)
Delete sentence end of Line 35-36 (Along with the pictures that points to a connection between Q and the President.)
Delete brackets, keep commas in Line 42 :Upon her presumed victory, (for which the Cabal unsuccessfully fought,)
Sorry - too much going on tonight…quick posted instead of replying.
Your updated copy in pastabin.
>https://pastebin.com/0BhYgVhJ I see where you edited already except for the following:
, (for which the Cabal unsuccessfully fought,)
Just need to delete the brackets/parentheses ( keep commas in place).
Thank YOU! Looking good! Night!
Last go around? From the PDF…
¶2: Delete comma before "can" or add comma after "about" in following:
someone curious about or just starting to learn about Q, can further….
Part III, end of last ¶: add "singular" to "collective noun" to read " collective singular noun"
Part IV ¶ 3&4
Rather than simply "Q stated…", edit to read, " Q has stated.."(¶3), and
In fact, Q has repeatedly stated..(¶4)
(1.present perfect denotes emphasis on the effect that a past action continues to have up to the present time and
-
need some variety plus significant transition markers between ¶, in case you're wondering "why"?!)
What is your native language?
Sorry I didn't get a chance to acknowledge this last night. Attached is edit to s/thing/s we missed plus a comment that I do not know quite where to share?!
That's a tough one:
-
Normies may well be "turned off" and "tune out" before actually reading Q's response.
On the other hand:
-
It may be enough of an "unmasking" to get them to ask themselves, "If that is true, what else about him - Hussein - is false?"
Biggest problem with that crumb is inserting it within an appropriate [textual] context so it doesn't just stand out like a sore…
I'll get more eyes on this tonight and get back with a consensus?!
Yes…. if "everything has meaning", then the misuse of the phrase, "in good conscience" to read "in good conscious" has significance ( even if unintended by the writer), especially if you believe in [the original etymological definition of ] inspiration?!
see>>2617324! Let me get more eyes on it tonight. Leaning against since the text doesn't even mention Hussein? Better to get one that supports a textual reference (SA/ Rothschild/Soros/banks/Five Eyes/ etc.) even if those don't have the same emotional impact?!
Haha.. yes, you got it!
Much better, anon! This references not just what has already been "outed" but not yet adjudicated (Awan), but will also pique interest RE: "the other person" as well as POTUS' speech. Most importantly, it references why we are all here: to DO something about evil, corruption, and to save the children!
Cool! Just wondered so there’s no double-dipping, so to speak, with multiple people doing a translation from scratch!
Collective singular is the term that denotes that a singular verb is used for a collective noun; e.g., Q (the person (sing.) and/or persons (pl) has stated (sing. Verb form)
Thanks!
Concerned that the longer the delay to “publish”, the less relevant it may seem, esp. with the July 31 date in the text. Thoughts?
True, that :)!
Curryfag pushed me to try translating too, so I'm going to put the first section out there and francofags can let me know if it's valable - worth my continuing or not?! Merci les amis!
Not a shill nor a techfag here, but a super serious patriot wanting to do what I do best,which is language/s ( multi-lingual former teacherfag and writerfag 'Merican here - weird, I know). Wouldn't know how to propagate finished product/s, but anxious to get the word out there! I've done a lot of translation before, just not anything approaching this subject matter which is why I thought I'd try. Appreciate other anons caution but appreciate practical advice even more!
Appreciate the vote of confidence; it'll take me a few days to continue ( can't do more till after the weekend).
>https://pastebin.com/7EEbSKDK
Sorry I can't work on this during the day this weekend so sending it now as time is short. The first document is "clean"; pls read through to get the flow. I finally was able to make some of the more significant cuts/edits to reduce redundancy, improve cohesion and, hopefully convey coherence in the original intention.
Second pdf is the version with edits visible.
Both based on above pastabin.
Understood.
N.B. That the thesis should, ideally, be at the end of the introductory paragraph (think inverted pyramid, with a "hook" ( analogy, rhetorical question, quotation, etc. to begin the intro.paragraph, followed by increasingly less general statements, leading to the specific thesis statement at the end.
One omission that has been bothering me is the lack of description of the anons themselves. While the focus is rightly Q ( and the President), it would be be appropriate and helpful, I think, to include at least a cursory description of who the anons themselves might be and how that true diversity impacts the type and quality of communications on the board.
Turns out I will have periods of time today that wasn't planning to have so will try to respond as needed and as able.
Just did another go around with edits highlighted this time for easier reading. Included very brief description of anons within context of last ¶ of Part II. See what you think.
Intro ¶ only - need to grab attention off the bat as well as enable smoother ( logical, coherent) sentence transitions.
Would help if I pasted it here…
No worries… sounds like our itineraries switched.
Correct.
Don’t wear yourself out tonight over any of it; stay strong!
I’m afraid I can’t help any more tonight; spent afternoon at urgent care with [ my third case of ] shingles. I will be available again starting tomorrow am
Much appreciated - night!
You’re right!
Thanks for checking this all out. I’ll check out your pastabin/pdf in the am
>https://pastebin.com/d0jHVcY9
I'm afraid that checking mechanics (grammar & punctuation) is a distant second to content! The former is simply a vehicle to adequately contain and advance the latter!
I'm very sorry it took me so long to sit down and grapple with more than grammar and punctuation, knowing that major revisions needed to be done to turn the excellent, detailed info into a format that is readable from a broad audience's point of view.
It is a difficult enough process to convey information in one person's "voice", never mind combining multiple "voices"!
So, keep in mind your intention to, essentially, compete with "professional" mainstream media!
To do this, you, as the primary author, need to consider that the writer's job is to write in such a way as to complete the following tasks:
-
Determine function/s: Broadly speaking, to Inform, Persuade, or Entertain (the latter is obviously not your purpose!).
-
Determine Audience: normies covers an enormous potential audience of semi-literate to highly educated, working-class to "elite" readers of English - and potentially many other languages.
-
Determine an overall tone (formal vs informal, etc.). This is set by the vocab and type of sentence structures used throughout and is probably the most difficult aspect of this endeavor: higher-level vocab. & sentence structure impede understanding for some but validate authority for others. The inverse is also true; i.e., simplistic, repetitive vocab & sentence structure have a definite place and can make an impact if used judiciously, but erode the reader's confidence in the writer's authority to make a case if that is the overall style of writing.
FYI I have attached last night's version with an addition at the end of last paragraph, plus notes before the beginning RE: the discussion of "happenings". Didn't have brain space to get in to it last night beyond acknowledging that "happening/s" is indeed a[n informal lexicon] word and not just anon jargon!
Understood! No worries! That’s why I wanted to encourage writing towards the audience ( fundamental consideration for any writer) as well as reclaiming the lexicon ( a potential personal goal as an anon in a PC world where up is down…).
If the word “diversity” is too hard to swallow, try eliminating the entire phrase, “demonstrating cooperative diversity” and substitute with “cooperating” to read:
“… stages of life, cooperating in the use of complementary skills, knowledge…..”
Assuming you have seen this post with its video of OANN's Posobiec "debunking" Q?
Also this from yesterday: http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/404879-q-more-qs-than-a
All the more important to get something out there WITH proofs (unllike Posobiec)since there are a lot of OANN and other MAGA fans who don't know where to start and who to believe.
Simple, readable, persuasive in its informative nature.
My post was not a reply to any other post but meant for the baker-scientific-non-writer anon who got this ball rolling.
My last edited version is found here:
It takes a lot of brain space and, ideally, time to grapple with ideas and how best to verbalize them; Baker-scientific-non-writer anon may need to prioritize board activities unless there’s another [good] reason to let this project slide?!
Go for it then and we’ll see it in the am if possible. If not, that’s ok too!
Since I don't know yet what you've already looked at, I'm attaching another copy with some items marked in yellow to distinguish from the blue edits you may have been working on.
Up till now, baker-scientific-non-writer anon has been "accepting" or not and then incorporating edits as they have been proffered.
Mechanical (grammar and punctuation) edits have been graciously accepted, but I think anon is having more difficulty with the larger textual suggestions that add form ( in particular to the opening and closing paragraph) to the fantastic,basic factual substance that he began with
I'll attach a "clean" copy of what I've done and you can compare with the last pastebin copy that b-s-n-w-anon posted.
The more eyes on this to comment and approve or not, the better.
>https://pastebin.com/u40egi0m
Trying to look at this but not able to respond till this afternoon. Until then next questions:
1) will it first be posted to QResearch general for mass anon approval ( since it is being attributed to all anons) and
2) where/how/to whom is this to be released?
Here is the pastebin version with all my edits marked plus explanations in [ ] ( see apologetic before your intro).
ThanQ anon. Godspeed.
Can we get this ready to go out tomorrow???!!!
Ok, thanks! I'll see what my brain will let me get through
Rats, I only saw the pastabin after struggling to copy edits from the PDF.
I feel like I've already explained the edits I made previously but I'm trying again (see attached PDF) Now that I have the pastabin I'll do a clean edit of that and post as another PDF for anons to check for themselves.
>https://pastebin.com/qSStdQvm
Clean edit of pastabin.
I can do a marked up PDF tomorrow if you prefer.
Honestly, though, I believe the last version I posted was the smoothest one with best transitions, appropriate language and lack of redundancy. you posted that my explanations were 100% correct but then didn't use many of the most vital edits ( vital because you had complicated thoughts that needed to be clarified). Tonight's version looks like we're going backwards.
Thanks… Will look tonight but probably won’t be able to get back on this till tomorrow
Always forget while in the middle of the text to ask if you shouldn’t include a “proof” that is clearly recognizable and means s/thing to normies ( the stringer, for ex., means nothing even to anons). That would be a “basic” piece of evidence.
To clarify: nothing should be omitted but added. There are no examples of crumbs nor explanations of the time and effort anons have gone through to line up crumbs with the clock to show "proofs".
If you read the latest NYT hit piece on QAnon movt - link dropped yesterday by Q- it looks as though the author, Schwartz, has been reading our draft. The basic fallacy he has used - as did Posobiec last week - is of not citing a source directly. In this case that means showing and explaining a QResearch crumb/Qclock proof. This am s/one posted the following:
>>No.2987831
This would be en pointe to use if [RR]is out today.
It is essential - basic - that an anon-written article contain what no other article dares present; i.e., a Qproof. One that needs little to no explanation other than what's on the graphic.
N.B. the article's use of an analogy to open with, attract the reader's attention, and set the stage to de-legitimize the facts as he presents them. That is an example of what I previously said you need to open this anon article with: an analogy, a [rhetorical or real] question, a statistic, etc.
In our case, a simple question does the job to not make the dense text of the entire article too intimidating - which it is.
Thanks for putting pastabin first and for your care in reading notations and making your own!
I'm not a Qclock decoder either so that's where it would be helpful perhaps to put this out there on QResearch and ask for help? As stated, this am's clock on the hammer would be perfect I think if it comes to pass and [RR] is out today. Just confirms that we have "insider info" as you put it without being "false prophets" like the MSM and 'pollsters".
Attached is the latest PDF. Cut and paste failed you on your pg 6 so I copypasta'd from a previous draft!
My notes/suggestions are in [ ]
All additions are to clarify/define for absolute normies and/or to address the most current MSM spin on Q/anons.
Thanks!
Ok no clock then but how to explain why we are anons who "follow" Q? Need an example of "insider info" or the whole premise ( of why we are here) falls apart.
Great… just an FYI, I'm going to be very limited in what I can do tomorrow and Friday and definitely can't do any more [almost] all-nighters…
Thank you! It is a privilege and honor to be able to contribute even in a small way. Thanks to you for taking the lead and accepting my contributions; that alone is not a small thing in today’s world!
I can look over stuff in a couple of hours if you’re ready then.
>https://pastebin.com/e9LiE6K4
Here you go. I will stop by as able tomorrow afternoon/pm. 3mill. is great!
You bet! I'll stop by early to mid-afternoon.
>>Thanks, I'll take a look!
>https://pastebin.com/FFncAAsX
Here is the latest. Pls check the left margin bars indicating changes since there are several commas/periods missing that are easy to overlook.
Who better to describe and explain the Qanon phenomenon than those other anonymous posters who interact online with Q, the deplorable "anons" themselves?
Put the ! outside the quotation marks.( eg. see here: https://grammarpartyblog.com/2012/07/30/inside-or-outside-question-marks-exclamation-points-and-quotation-marks/ )
Sorry I’m phonefagging so not sure which version I just responded to- I think it should be this one
You’re using the first version:
Who better… than the “anons” themselves, the anonymous posters….
It’s a rhetorical question ( ie the answer is the question itself) but still a question; hence the ?
You can add an exclamation mark after the question mark- maybe that will make it seem less “odd” to you?!
>https://pastebin.com/e5vQekXv
I was already almost done with this pastabin when you posted latest, so am going ahead and sending this anyway.
I may be able to work on it some before late am tomorrow. Afternoon will be hit or miss till later pm
Happy baking!
Yeah - definitely not me. I told you the other day that the NYT hit piece writer, Schwartz, appeared to have taken our article, info from it, and reworked it to suit himself. I'm sure he's not the only one. Today is going to be really crazy for me but will try to get to this…
Enjoy.!!!.. takes pressure off me since i have other business to attend to. Will get this back as soon as possible ( early this pm?).
Thanks! Hope you had a good break?! I'll be able to respond now this pm as long as I can stay awake!
Cool… thanks! I'll stand by.
You listed all the boards anons and Q created, including the private ones where Q posted/posts, but anons cannot; they can only respond on /qresearch/
Got it, thanks, I'll do what I can and let you know when I've had enough for tonight. You work much faster than I do!
Yes
Yeah, after looking at it, I was wondering what the purpose was… but it did point out an obvious oversight: all of the section headings are questions - without question marks! Oops
>https://pastebin.com/40GxchFy
One of my biggest struggles with this is the punctuation because I come from a British educational background (even tho US citizen) but my grad. degree is from a US university in Eng. Rhetoric and Composition. Basically, American punctuation rules have gotten sloppier and more inconsistent over time. I would put all punctuation outside of those quotation marks unless they are a part of the quotation, but US custom is now directing writers to put commas and periods inside quotation marks regardless of whether or not they are part of the "quote". All other punctuation (!,?) would be ridiculous inside the quote and so is placed as terminal punctuation - as it should, and as I believe all terminal punctuation should be.
So, it depends on how consistent you want to be and which set of rules you want to be consistent in applying.
Yep, you see that I instinctively used it throughout the majority of the text, so I would actually go ahead and standardize it with all punctuation outside the quotation marks (unless a part of the quotation) since we have so many terms in quotation marks. Keeps it cleaner. Tried to go through it quickly ( attached)
pg 2 par. 4 This anon is known as “the Baker.”
Lol! That's what I mean! Terminal punctuation means terminal punctuation - except when it "looks ok"! I understand and agree completely that's why I said it's really a matter of how consistent you want to be. To be consistent we have to put all [. , ! ?] outside quotation marks unless a part of the quotation
Yes, fine.
Yes, fine.
Yes, fine.
Yes inside.
Yes
There's no ellipsis here
Super job! Thank you and rest well, anon!
>https://pastebin.com/f5T4VXfM
I'll look at the pastabin tonight but wait till tomorrow to send thoughts and check out PDF. Thanks again
"There are no coincidences."
Will be back in a couple of hours.
Just back and looking now
>https://pastebin.com/eb9Qn6Tv
Phonefagging for a bit so can’t edit for @10 min.
This is way too wordy. No need to outline anything; just introduce to anons to read and give thumbs up (preferably!).
Save propagation ideas till after coming review period is over and at time of posting final version.
>https://pastebin.com/eb9Qn6Tv
Whoops… I think we're overlapping now. Just finished this and saw you have another
>https://pastebin.com/pjMzr8kS
I don't understand what you intend to be the purpose of the intro so not spending much time on it, but there are some ways to simplify/clarify.
I'll look at the final PDF now and respond to that next!
pg 1 par 1: Add "now": The time has now come for an …
par 4: Need to indent: Since the MSM has yet to….
part IV par 4: Need square brackets, not parentheses:
Five Eye (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, and USA) Alliance…
Section III par. 2: Add "also" : "and crumbs that also imply that Q is close…"
Yeah mostly the first couple sections; outlines should contain same grammatical structures for similar level ideas, and little to no usage of articles (a,the) or prepositions. But it's a lot of work to rework the entire thing esp. when I'm not sure of utility ( plus I'm tired?!). In other words, don't mind me on that one.
Ok I'll stop concernfagging over that! Instead, I'll concernfag over the first line (still/again).
My first instinct was to write, "Have you seen "Q"?" and I really feel ( I know, "muh feelz") that that is the way to go; it is a little tongue-in-cheek dig at all the Posobiec-Microchip-type know-it-alls. Plus it reminds anons too that we are, essentially, "acting by faith,and not by sight" - a reminder to "trust, but verify,"
Layered meanings, Q-style.
Exactly - that too! Thanks1
Do you want me to do something with this?
BTW if you're talking about me in the (one baker has helped edit/work on it) I'm not a baker…but a tech challenged long-time lurker anon who decided you needed help that I thought I could provide if you were willing and able ( which you were/are!). Started tentatively and today here we are.
So if you're able to post the final PDF I'd love to have a last look, call it a night, and see what the other anons think
Already tried both; not happening
OK thanks - still couldn't open but saved the meta link to the hard drive and then was able to open from there. Looks like I can do that too from this thread.
pg 1 par 1: "…campaign whose goal is to help President Trump.."
change to …" campaign, the goal of which is to help…"
I'll finish looking over but that was the only thing that I know has been bothering me..
Part IV par 4: "…president elect,and President, to no avail. [Begin new paragraph]
After macroscopically describing the Cabal’s operations and…"
That's it, folks!
>>304I1996
Part IV par. 6
FROM: This “awakening” occurs when anons decode
TO: This “awakening” occurs as anons decode
OK, let's roll, or you know I'll find something else!!!!
Got it. Good to go!
Ok anon, gotta go. Thank you for all you're doing.
BTW I started to translate this into French weeks ago before getting so heavily involved in the editing. Don't know if I can finish it though as the next few weeks I'll be out of pocket.
If I can, I'll post it here in case it's deemed useful.
Good night and God bless
Did I miss it? have you put it on qresearch for anon approval?
BTW FYI y'all, English is not a Latin-based (Romance) language like French ( and 8 other Romance - from Roman - languages)but a Germanic one, a close cousin of Frisian (an area that is a Dutch province). Germanic in its basic grammatical structure and vocabulary base, with a heavy influx of French vocabulary ( not grammar) @ 1066 after Guillaume le conquérant ( William the Conqueror), expanded his territory from his duchy in France ( as Duke of Normandy).
"English" is a "mongrel" language, developed through successive invasions of the island of Britannica ( the Roman's name) by Celts ( pre-Roman times); Romans ( early AD); Anglo-Saxon (Germanic) tribes; Norsemen (Vikings); and Normans (French).
English is therefore considered to be part of the Germanic language family since its basic grammatical structure and vocab base are germanic with a heavy influx of Norman french vocab. in 1066.
It uses the Roman script (alphabet) to represent the sounds (originally) of the words, as opposed to the Greek or Cyrillic (Russian) alphabets.
All three writing systems are of languages that are part of the same major language family group ( Indo-European) to which Sanskrit also belongs. Hindi belongs to the Indo-Aryan branch of the same (Indo-European) language family as English - but it uses the Devanagari script ( commonly used to write Sanscrit).
In contrast, for e.g., spouseanon's native language belongs to a non-Indo-European lang. group that has no structural connections whatsoever with English ( or Hindi) but has some vocabulary borrowed from Chinese, Arabic, Sanscrit, Portuguese and Dutch ( all invaders), and it uses the Roman alphabet, like English.
Y'all are right there; the more distant a language from English in the language family "tree", the more difficult to translate. Even though it has improved its syntactic [sentence-level] functions,Google translates word-level meanings, and even at that level the translation can be ridiculous or unintelligible.
And have you noticed that French and Spanish are the languages listed for readily avail. translation?
The problem is translating in context which involves not just word and sentence-level meaning but cultural context including rhetorical functions which can be almost entirely opposite of English; e.g., Japanese rhetoric prioritizes describing an object in terms of what it IS NOT ( think a "spiral" of meaning) rather than what it IS (think "Blunt and Direct time"). On a scale of directness, English is up there just below German, French is less direct still, and Asian languages PREFER indirectness in communicating; i.e., almost exactly opposite.
So curryanon need not worry about word-for-word translation; if he understands the ideas we have expressed, he must write their equivalent in the form that best matches the style-level appropriate for his audience. A complex process at best.
Have you noticed how the language landscape of English has changed since the 2016 campaign? President Trump is maligned for his "unorthodox" use of words, which is characterized by Very Germanic "blunt and direct" speech ( as opposed to the euphemisms and out-right lies our culture has been spoon-, and lately force- , fed). But many of his direct terms are also allusions, and he uses allegory (think the tale of "The Serpent") favored in Asian cultures to "gently" speak the truth.
Now here we all are on 8chan, learning a different way of communicating that involves the rhetorical strategies of all the world's cultures.
So back to original question from yesterday - what is the timeline on this ( the final pic may soon be irrelevant, intro "past several weeks" is turning into months, etc.)? Or do we not want to advertise that info?! Mostly want general anon eyes-on approval.
You’re right… we should include “Read the Bible - God wins” in the “sayings” and “BIble verses” in the list of topics. Can you get a list of the verses to put in parentheses?
I’m with this too- let people who are really interested find their way ( like I did) but maintain boundaries for safety, security and sanity.
I agree we don’t need to actually quote any verses but “Bible verses” should be mentioned in the list of topics and Q says “Read the Bible- God wins” more than once. If things are going to become as chaotic and/or life changing as it would appear, there are reasons for everything Q “says” and perhaps we would be remiss to not “mention” it. That, though, is the reason we put in the last line ( …those preyed upon to pray…)
>https://pastebin.com/fqAazJw0
Ok, so I put the Q quote, "Read the Bible. God wins." in the list of "sayings". Pertinent on many levels.
Listing "Bible verses" doesn't fit well in the long list of topics discussed, not the least because Q doesn't discuss them. Maybe Q is waiting for us to discuss them like we do all the other topics?
Anyway, just putting the references (Jeremiah 29:11 and John 3:16) Q has given us to look at underneath Pic 2 might be the way to go?
Sorry - was thinking I should have done that beforeI left…. last section and below pic 2 highlighted.
Please DO NOTuse Google translate!!!! I can guarantee that you will be scorned/discredited. Better to allow a native-speaker who has been following to make the effort or find someone who can; I believe there are alt-media types/bloggers who are following but if you use google translate you might as well have a shill do a Posobiec-style piece.
What "last part"? The verse "addresses"? I'm kinda of the same mind about that; "Read the Bible. God wins" is important ( and hilarious - shows Q's/anon's/God's sense of humor, something sorely lacking in Demoncratland).
Points readers in the right direction so unnecessary to "preach" too loudly with the verses.
Looked in the bread where you posted it last night but didn't see any responses and don't have time to go through them all so kinda disappointing to not read directly but I'll take your word for it!
Just checked it again and it looks good to go if you can include the one phrase," Read the Bible. God wins" (2 phrases/sentences actually; this is the way Q wrote it!) where I put it in the highlighted copy I sent a few minutes ago ( and don't put in the verse designations after pic 2)
My concern too but I don't know about graphics/spacing requirements. Better to have smaller graphics and 1 1/2 line spacing?
Also double space ( not just indent) between paragraphs? It is very dense compared to current publications ( especially online).
Here's an example of 1.5 line spacing, etc.