>>2614302

will edit soon anon

thanks again!

>>2618409

kek we know anon, thats what is keeping me from editing right now

odd you posted here though

>>2633468

kek can't read a word of that

shit, I should use hyperlinks shouldn't I?

>>2634131

KEK!

probably true, but the main ones first!

going to test if the hyperlinks work with the RD watermark

>>2634221

thats a no

>>2635294

very true, agree with all that

making pngs for each page

an anon in general gave me the "Aint clickin on that shit" when I posted the pdf

kek

testing these

(1/2)

>>2637290

>>2637290

>>2637302

DAMN, thats clear as fuck

testing this

>>2640058

I'm thinking maybe this coming monday for the final copy?

I want to reread a few moar times though and get a fe moar edits if needed

>>2640254

kek, a legit WriterAnon should that!

>>2640211

no doubt they're scared, if its just a larp, WHY TRY TO SHUT IT DOWN (pun intended)

and I hope as many people as possible can read this, its just the basics, but it covers a lot

going to reread the latest, see if I can catch any errors

so anons, I chekked the Qmap pdf, and it's dates are different (pic1 related)

1. I agree on the first Q post, oct. 28th

(first crumb)

1. the pdf says the first use of /cbts/ (8ch) was nov. 25th, but I say it was CREATED ON THE 19th:

https://8ch.net/cbts/res/1.html

1. the pdf says the first use of /thestorm/ was the jan. 6th, but I can show its the jan. 5th:

https://8ch.net//thestorm/res/3995.html#4657

1. the pdf says the first use of /GA/ and /qresearch/ was jan. 9th, but I can show both were in fact jan 8th:

https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/1.html#25 and (pic2 related)

1. I agree on the date Q stopped /GA/ and started /PF/

COULD ANYONE CHEKK THESE?

was rereading and decided to in depth look at the dates again

>>2652257

>>2652297

>>2652314

appreciate that anon, went to the Qmap thread, found the link, must have been an old one

all clear, kek!

updated pastabin:

https://pastebin.com/x7f5MMhp

will update the pdf soon, here are the png's (1/2)

>>2652677

all those check out BO (pg2)

was telling an anon in general, didn't add the 8pol part, and only state when Q first posted on /thestorm/, not its creation date (do the opposite for /cbts/)

thanks for checking BO, I was using an old version of the pdf (as the anon said), but still wanted to triple check the dates

>>2652794

(2/2)

>>2653166

just finished the updated PDF for the rough draft

I had found two slight errors

still would love moar edits, or a few moar read throughs

I think its just about ready though

>>2653412

I will

maybe shoot for a [4am] like drop on Sunday Night/Monday Morning?

still want to get anons to spread it

>>2653471

thanks anon use this though (not sure which version you're using, there have been MANY):

>>2653351

>>2653351

>>2652794

>>2652794

>>2653471

>>2653514

here is an example

I think you're right

kek and this is why we should have moar eyes on

its fixed anon, will repost when moar edits have been made

>>2653540

I'll post the new pastabin though

https://pastebin.com/999ssMvm

>>2653546

this pic seems to indicate that because the bold can stand on its own, that it should be INSIDE the ( ) right?????: "For more details, the reader should to go to sites like qanon.app, qmap.pub, qproofs.com, and other similar sites that compile crumbs, side-by-sides (graphics with sources confirming the intel in crumbs side by side), and proofs (graphics that show “coincidences” mentioned by Q are not coincidences at all)."

confirming what you're saying now, I'm really unfamiliar with this type of punctuation

>>2653544

if that punctuation was right, disregard the new pastabin

>>2653778

kek, go back to baking baker

>>2653764

you used which pastebin for that?

>>2653778

>>2653764

those edits on Grammarly have the period outside the parenthesis so I'll go with that

>>2653906

ok got it

in the process of editing now

I'll try to post updated stuff soon

introduced appropriately

or

introduced properly

which one sounds better (first one is from your edits?)

>>2653955

got it

I think I'll keep some of the quotes on the names of the threads, I think the quotes are valid there

kek, shouldn't 2 million be two million???

or does that rule for less than 10 not stand when its millions?????

>>2654057

kek I did

https://www.grammarbook.com/numbers/numbers.asp

I'll just be consistent

updated pastabin:

https://pastebin.com/7EEbSKDK

updated PDF

(updated pics next)

>>2654292

>>2654296

>>2654296

>>2654297

testing pasta's links

(pasta)

if you haven't, read Q: The Basics (rough draft) read it and tell us what you think

its something a few anons have been putting together (pic related is all pages of the rough draft in one graphic, '''OPEN IN A NEW TAB’’’)

its meant to be long, informative, and wordy (6 pages, ~3500 words), so it fights back against the blatant disinfo the MSM has been putting out with FACTS, not fake news

rough outline so you can explain it to someone else:

I: Intro

(Introduces Q/GA, calls out MSM, say what side by sides and proofs are, give links to qanon.pub, qmap.pub, and qproofs.com)

II: When and Where did Q start to post

(4pol → CBTS → /cbts/ (8) → /thestorm/ → /qresearch/ & /GA/ → /PF/; don't give out the link to here; kek I "redacted" it; explain WHAT THE FUCK A BAKER DOES)

III: Who posts as Q

(NOT doxxing, just laying out facts from crumbs and the signoffs)

IV: What does Q post

(signatures and stringers; the Cabal, +++ ++ +, topics in crumbs; the plan, GA; and moar but just an overview really)

V: Why does Q post

(conclusion, GA, The plan, call out the MSM again; quote the Declaration, wrap it up)

Here are the relevant links (rough draft) ALL OFF BREAD IN Q: The Basics Thread:

>>2654292 (pdf and pastebin)

>>2654296 >>2654297 (pics of all pages of rough draft)

>>2576347 (ideas on where to spread it to, once the final is posted)

>>2591361 (an anon’s theme/design idea; goes from a storm to calm) actually awesome, check that out (link to links of all the pages)

If you find errors PLEASE TELL US IN THE THREAD

we want to get AS MANY anons’ eyes on this before putting out a final copy (BO commented on it, would like the BVs to check it out too)

It can be spread far, so we want to get it right, if you have ideas on how to spread, please let us know

And if you have read it, thanks, trying not to spam this, but want as many anons to contribute as possible

We are thinking its close to being final, still want as many anons to weigh in as possible

Thanks for eating muh pasta, WWG1WGA

>>2654339

chekked

night anons, tired as fuck

>>2654355

gotcha anon, I'll be back in a few hours, really early morning where I am

>>2654755

kek I couldn't have written this shit in middle school, let alone understand Q

gonna keep it, work on the translations

and its meant to be easily read

I don't usually write like this, I write scientific technical papers

I'd post one, but I'd dox myself

if I find a way to not dox myself by posting a paper, I'll post some of one

>>2656908

which UID were you?

>>2657034

gotcha, there were a few edits that were helpful though

thanks anon (they were minor though, but still, needed)

>>2658870

honestly, could care less about lefties, i doubt they'd follow Q, basically antithetical to everything they think

but the audience is mostly American, and "and the world" shows up a lot

you mean adding to the end of the first paragraph?

>>2659118

>>2659018

I gotcha

and clearly a group from the World

gtfo out of here tiresias

the only think you're doing is bumping the thread

>>2659928

my bad, kek

*gtfo of here

REAL tired of arguing with blatant newfags and shills in general, will take a look at the almost-final copy tomorrow morning

BO, if you can, read it over once again too

ALL ANONS WHO HAVE EDITED SHOULD TOO

o7