Anonymous ID: 35f348 Aug. 14, 2018, 7:44 a.m. No.2595167   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Strzok lawyer says - no right to fire Strzok

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/13/politics/strzok-attorney-fbi-power-not-right-cnntv/index.html

 

I think the lawyer should review this Executive Order

 

Executive Orders

Executive Order Promoting Accountability and Streamlining Removal Procedures Consistent with Merit System Principles

 

Budget & Spending

 

May 25, 2018

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/search/?paged=10&s=executive+orders

 

Sec. 2. Principles for Accountability in the Federal Workforce. (a) Removing unacceptable performers should be a straightforward process that minimizes the burden on supervisors. Agencies should limit opportunity periods to demonstrate acceptable performance under section 4302(c)(6) of title 5, United States Code, to the amount of time that provides sufficient opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance.

 

(b) Supervisors and deciding officials should not be required to use progressive discipline. The penalty for an instance of misconduct should be tailored to the facts and circumstances.

 

(c) Each employee’s work performance and disciplinary history is unique, and disciplinary action should be calibrated to the specific facts and circumstances of each individual employee’s situation. Conduct that justifies discipline of one employee at one time does not necessarily justify similar discipline of a different employee at a different time — particularly where the employees are in different work units or chains of supervision — and agencies are not prohibited from removing an employee simply because they did not remove a different employee for comparable conduct. Nonetheless, employees should be treated equitably, so agencies should consider appropriate comparators as they evaluate potential disciplinary actions.

 

(d) Suspension should not be a substitute for removal in circumstances in which removal would be appropriate. Agencies should not require suspension of an employee before proposing to remove that employee, except as may be appropriate under applicable facts.