>>2607576 (LB)
I saw.
Might be worthwhile looking into the owner of the 2 accounts the vids are posted from.
estimates on engagement are far better with the actual vid. analytics than just the view count…
SCOTUS rulings can be re-litigated - they're not set in stone, and a change on the bench, sometimes as little as 1 member change, can precipitate a change in ruling.
That's precisely why the left is freaking out about Kavanaugh and Roe v Wade
no, only newfags have been ignoring Epstein Island.
Were you around ~dec-feb timeframe, anons went over the publicly available info with a fine tooth comb (and then went back over it 2 or 3 more times for good measure).
look up dnc rnc consent decree:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_caging
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/29/republicans-ballot-security-267717
https://www.scribd.com/document/113923491/RNC-V-DNC-Lawsuit-about-Voter-Fraud
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/dnc-ask-court-to-knock-rnc-for-trump-s-voter-fraud-crusade
it will be enlightening to say the least…
Fortunately:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/09/rnc-ballot-security-consent-decree-328995
Wasnt any good reason to look that direction at the time