Anonymous ID: 9f803a Aug. 17, 2018, 6:20 p.m. No.2650519   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0767 >>0865

First

 

OF ALL

 

I get NAT_SEC @

 

>>2630332

 

"Uncle @ No Such. Tight-lipped, linguist, CScience, Maryland. Works with these guys? @ INSCOM 300th 5 man teams… Pak, and (1) time Russia. Looked at 32536AB00 Godspeed."

 

Discipline is part of The Key…

 

The following ASSUMES

 

-Q is legit intelligence worker

 

-Q has ALL ACCESS

 

-Q, on top of that, NEVER SLEEPS, and covers all answers all accurately. It is our deficit @ < 40000 ft view. Which Q will help corroborate.

 

If above is not true then_

 

Q is a larp at which case, WWG1WGA[-1] engages @ "The Bounty" HIJACK BOAT … with @ organized anon principles.

 

OR -Q is BUSY; I like this scenario. Q comments sometimes, hastily @ every news event, because he feels a responsibility to us and the movement @ 1776, Q has access to intel, but cant possibly use at all @ each occurrence; he gives us an analysis via professional perspective per questions.

 

Q is a moderator, or team of moderators; at which case, was 4chan theatre and the 2nd act took place here;

 

?

 

I dont know.

 

?

 

I know PROTECT 6/14-46 was either EXTREMELY lucky or ACCURATE

 

I know Q tends to know the media BEFORE They KNOW what they are going to do.

 

All Q explanations are plausible; they make sense.

 

One can argue that these are AD Hoc, with enough confusion thrown in-between to make the future for anons.

 

At which case I argue; if enough anons choose to, It

 

BECOMES the future.

 

I, believe Q is sincere.

 

I, really believe that. I dont know if all that is promised will land, but I believe Q will be a sincere creature and behave that way; in this respect:

 

I believe in Q.

 

If the assumption is that Q is sincere, and offers direction, insight, drops; what do anons have to lose?

 

These were questions I had for Q; leading to a DIRECT question, that would Help ME, and solve a lot of problems. Questions defined by attempted answers:

 

>>2600470

 

Line by line ANS:

 

Mathematical possibility <1%

 

No

 

Intercept occurred quickly relative to alert and plane take off speed; either already in air or……..

 

Missile Intercepts occur at the earliest, the half way mark or the final third of the parabolic path to target. Halfway mark assumes initial detection of missle occurred at moment of launch. Unless you are using satellite or EMF/hacking, intercepts are done by another missile. Energy weapons pending.

 

Aircraft Deviates from planned flight path@ that moment a system of checks and contact engaged.

 

Speculation at end of answers.

 

No, people wouldnt make the effort to fish.

 

Many billionaries own Islands.

 

Not as many, but enough, more visits or perhaps burying things @ speculation.

 

[GEO-T] = GEOTHERMAL

 

Workable theory exists in 1970; islands have a higher point of Earth / HEAT energy given tectonic and volcanic activity. Some islands created by volcanoes.

 

So possible sure… we have the technology now, assumedly, given the M curve and rate of technological growth by things like Computers since 1970. Clandestine? Of course.

 

Unfortunate by product of Free Market in (CurrentState) Free Energy would destroy values and measurements @ PetroDollar; so incentives become counter-productive at some point; The other BIGGER point, is to manage free energy and total information control in a breakaway society @ "AS the WORLD (BURNS).

 

Speculation: Plane acted as a missle? full vertical loop HARD to do; I Like the story, but autopilot and RC more feasible @ 7/10 of all plane incidents per Q; further bodies are harder to recover. What investigations (eyes on the ground) by what agencies are triggered per plane crash?

 

???:::

 

("Q ")DIRECT QUESTION-REASONABLE:

 

Is there a "widow" in the plane crash? Did Russell Die?

 

No anon has satisfied answer @ careful where we tread… deflection?? too close? sandy hook pizza gate …

 

TRAP??

 

Q answer not explicit; but this question about a WIDOW ^ deserves it.

 

Overall understanding at 'self' and 'mission.' :::

 

=@LARP? @large

 

The success of total mission relies on also what patriots, the Unknown Factor are willing to do, and their conversations, corroboration of events; Light to Dark, Questions are Flashlights; these are all aligning critical inertia to the timeline of drops, declassifications, memos, congressional testimony. You know this and planned for it. Some things are MADE to happen, and require participation @WWG1WGA

 

I still believe. I refined my reasons for doing so. Did anons?

 

Heavy FLAK is IN-COMING

Test your Self before the battle

Tests you.

_

Anonymous ID: 9f803a Aug. 17, 2018, 6:40 p.m. No.2650767   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0865 >>0879

>>2650519

legit questions not answered or even blasted by anons ; why?

 

same thing last 2 days.

 

Dont have too much to think?

 

Im not asking for anything but discernment; is there a WIDOW or NOT?

Anonymous ID: 9f803a Aug. 17, 2018, 6:58 p.m. No.2651006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1076

>>2650606

i like you

@

>>2547835

language comprehension?

 

3rd image many

 

"iterations" from being a sphere

 

1st… all the things not in -2 + 2 both imaginary and planer but done through Euclid and Trig(persia, india)

 

Degrees?

 

Visual,

 

Spiral of spheres arriving at a chain of spheres collapsing into a principle of infinity,

2.

that principle, visual, of a chain of spheres, represented as a sphere, collapsing into one other principle containing all previous principles repeated (depending on how far back you go)

3

This is 1 'rate' of infinity identified as an energy signature; everyone

has one.

 

Not everyone

has understanding

 

sphere representation does not = truth

sphere representation = a truth, a possible way

honor dignity, and honor all ways

 

Keys Door

 

Comms mutually understood.

 

You (are) Welcome (here)

 

TY, hadnt played in a long time. God-speed.

You know me…

 

Does"Russelll" leave a WIDOW or Not?

I do not expect an answer. In your estimation is the question important for the board and for Q?

 

The implication is that this highlighted incident relies on a crazed pilot, who is now dead. In order to corroborate Q, which YOU are posting on the board; is Russell dead a valid question?

 

I usually settle for vague interesting answers; I like puzzles, and I like to solve, but I need to know if the question of rather or not a WIDOW of said dead person is involved in the questioning. Q is cold on this. Do you think its a valid question for this board?

 

Hows 'tensor math' going? Man builds what he sees in his mind; I wont discourage you. I see the language you speak, even if im not as fluent.