Anonymous ID: c30765 Aug. 22, 2018, 12:54 p.m. No.2704387   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2704358

There actually is but since you already have a defeatist attitude, I am not going to waste my time explaining it to you. Try re reading Q crumbs. He has said it more than once. Either believe it or not. Your choice.

Anonymous ID: c30765 Aug. 22, 2018, 1:02 p.m. No.2704464   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2704419

That part of it is, yes. But, how it came to be approved is where the crimes lie that can be prosecuted. Corruption, pay to play, friend, extorsion. All still illegal acts.

Anonymous ID: c30765 Aug. 22, 2018, 1:10 p.m. No.2704544   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2704474

Anons more focused on handwriting skills than actual wording, kek.

The first note shows just how serious they took their job and how intelligent the jury.

Anonymous ID: c30765 Aug. 22, 2018, 1:12 p.m. No.2704568   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2704534

How do you think that interview will resonate with the general public? She, (((they))) are in such a bubble, they really don't know how majority of Americans will feel about the abject hypocrisy of her statement.

Anonymous ID: c30765 Aug. 22, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.2704655   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4876

>>2704523

Exactly why there is no concern for evidence to be injected legally at this point in time. It's all been said and done. The plea deal was made 4 months ago and it is just now made public. His plea does not allow for evidence to be admitted because there will be no trial in his case on those specific charges. It's done.

The question is, what did they get out of him so they finally brought the case to light? Who did they use him to inform on? Potus? Well, no charges against Potus. Maybe Trump Foundation?