Not a bad article, and more informative than most.
Here is the most salient point:
"Namely, they represent a political force that can craft resonant narratives and push them through major social media networks into the mainstream."
This is our mission, Anons. And, as this article demonstrates, it's highly effective.
You should be proud. Have some boobs.
Props on a well-written article. As I mentioned before, better than most.
A couple of things you didn't mention that you should have:
the number of paid and unpaid shills attempting to disrupt our work. Some of the issues you attribute to our anons are actually misleading posts by shills.
you misinterpret the point and purpose of some of the "inaccurate" information that gets forced into the mainstream via our meme drops. We know it's inaccurate. The point isn't the accuracy, the point is the exposure the subject gets through the media's coverage of the inaccuracy. Yes, there might not be an official uptick in the number of human trafficking cases yet, as such things take time to accrue . . . but the discussion of that misinformation encourages more interest in the subject than waiting for "accurate information" to appear.
This is an open-source intelligence operation. Those of us at the heart of it understand that nothing here can be trusted on its own. The weak-minded and easily-fooled quickly discredit themselves and soon seek platforms where they can feel more important.
-We are Patriots. Not white supremacists, anti-Semites (Except for Phil – Hi, Phil!), or neo-Nazis. The core values of the board have always been anti-corruption and pro-accountability. Adherence to the Constitutional principals that are our legacy. And reclamation of a functional Constitutional Republic, not an oligarchical technarchy directing public policy without our consent. That's it. All of the bullshit on the board is secondary to overturning the "Military-Industrial Complex"/Deep State that has constrained our liberty and denied their own accountability.
Your article, while well-written, was clearly biased against that perspective – I understand why – and that's why you got called out on it here. The question you have to ask yourself as a reporter is . . . what happens when some of the core Q stuff actually starts happening? What happens when the conspiracy is no longer theory, but is seen as the guiding force of public policy for the last few decades?
Just how would you view us then?
AnalystAnon
Your challenge is before you, Anon. How can this be overcome?
Time to weaponize our autism.
Dude, we've been at this for like 9, 10 months straight. We're willing to do 9 or 10 more.
Either you're a Patriot or you're a bystander.