>>330613
my point exactly!
Q misquotes are picking up steam lately
>>330623
mad that i'm catching on to the misquote tactic? Great!
>>330613
my point exactly!
Q misquotes are picking up steam lately
>>330623
mad that i'm catching on to the misquote tactic? Great!
horrible way to taint what might be a good movie
This ^, actually sounds more like how barry thinks and acts. Becoming that which you hunt?
someone quoting Q. lurk moar
don't confuse anons quoting Q with an Actual Q post, if that WAS accidental. YET…It was you earlier that said "Q is here", and then pointed an anon quoting Q, looks really suspicious. so, again, lurk moar and research before making fake predictions and/or asking questions that can be easily answered by RESEARCH. this Is a research board, ya know
Again:
We Don't Know 100% who P is, and I stand on that 100%, I didn't say Putin idiot, follow the thread
nice dig-its
follow the thread, don't believe everything you read. Old crumb (past), and still one that future hasn't proven. So everyone of us saying that we know for a fact who P is for sure, has NOT had it confirmed. Sometimes the most intelligent answer is: I don't know.
So I say it once more for all of us, We. Don'.t KNOW. yet.