Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:17 p.m. No.3307406   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307387

You are, currently, the only one arguing against any addition to the bread anon. Several other anons have voiced support with you the lone dissent.

 

Maybe the mirror reference is appropriate here.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:22 p.m. No.3307454   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307432

 

This is where he is said to be buried. Should be easy enough for some enterprising anon to walk over and check I suppose. If they feel it's worthwhile.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/john-mccain-buried-best-friend-decades-public-service/story?id=57558580

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:25 p.m. No.3307485   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307443

Again, you are literally the only anon that is arguing against it being in the dough at all.

 

I suggested a full list, which was quite reasonably argued against with a suggestion of the most recent 5. And nobody said at the top of the dough either.

 

We carry plenty of topics, with links, in the dough - I see no compelling reason what so ever not to compromise. clearly you do and being so vocal about it frankly I suspect your motives are not quite so honorable as they should be.

 

Ultimately, it's still up for discussion, so no movement unless and until we hear from more.

 

With that, I consider this topic closed (in so far as your responses are involved anyway).

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:41 p.m. No.3307638   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307595

>>3307548

 

Just going to point out that what 53-47 referred to is not clear. We assume it is the Kavanaugh vote, but that is our applying biases and expectations to the post. Not supported factually yet - so there is no 'hedging'. There is only speculation.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:46 p.m. No.3307700   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307656

>.. but I have a template for my graphic if its Justice K vote total

That's just good planning anon. Be prepared.

 

It's also entirely likely that Kavanaugh was set up to fail (and be well rewarded after) and initiate the final destruction of the Dems in the mid terms (and, very likely, in perpetuity).

 

Also equally possible - maybe even more so - that even in being shot down, Trump just waits until after the left suffers the red wave and renominates.

 

We will all need bigger boats if that course of events unfolds. The leftist tears will drown the rockies in their volume and flow.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:54 p.m. No.3307746   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307702

There are literally infinite ways to interpret that post. Just off the top of my head,

 

it could mean 'if the vote were held right now, here is the head count'

 

or it could mean 'here will be the final vote'

 

or it could be a reference to last years Senate vote to block a Saudi arms deal. (sauce: https://www.businessinsider.com/saudi-arabia-arms-deal-senate-vote-2017-6)

 

There's 3 very, very plausible, very easy explanations and when you remove confirmation bias, all are equally possible.

 

Plenty more.

 

My point is after having been following Q posts for the entirety of the time on 8ch and soon after they started back on Pol, I've learned to not attempt to make predictions based on my assumption of being 'right'.

 

I just ended up looking silly, no matter how reasonable the conclusion seemed at the time.

 

Step back, apply some discernment, and question your own assumptions before stating you've got it all figured out.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 10:56 p.m. No.3307759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307746

In fact, particularly in light of the post immediately prior to the 53-47 post, it could also mean post-mid terms, the senate will be 53 GoP vs 47 Dem

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 11 p.m. No.3307789   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307781

I don't remember it off the top of my head, and going to head 'to' bed soon - but I'm pretty sure the former agent is named in the email/letter floating around twitter and in at least 1 past bread notables.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 11:03 p.m. No.3307807   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307793

thanks. I misread it anyway, thinking [former] referred to the agent that CBF coached to pass a poly.

 

I was wrong, thank you for the correct.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 11:05 p.m. No.3307825   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307799

No, I never said that.

 

In fact, I agree it is likely that it is referring to the final confirmation count.

 

Just pointing out based on far too many past embarrassments, don't go assuming you know, just because you're sure of yourself.

 

Keep in mind, based on Graham's comments today, it's entirely possible that he could get shot down this week, then renominated post mid terms and confirmed with the 53-47 vote.

 

Many possibilities, timeline unknown, and all we can do is interpret the best we can. When we do interpret, we have to be sure not to go spreading disinfo accidentally and unintentionally discredit ourselves in the process.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 11:10 p.m. No.3307880   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307869

Can we start a dead pool?

 

My bet is on Shipp being next to go of twitter, based on this twat - and based on what's gotten others banned recently.

Anonymous ID: 8393e9 Oct. 2, 2018, 11:23 p.m. No.3307999   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3307943

Thank you!

 

Although I'm done arguing with that echo-chambered idiot. I personally 'do' think that the q drop was referring to the confirmation vote this week, but I also know all too damned good n well not to go spouting off and making predictions any more.

 

I prefer the 'wait and see' then we can use it as a proof approach, vs making myself - and by extension, all of us - look like idiots.