>>3307285 lb

>I could not disagree more, sorry.

Then you should start your own board that follows the rubric of priorities that match your own. Here, we have notables that flow in and out each bread. Any lasting topic an anon has interest in goes into a dedicated thread.

>Sounds more like an attempt to hide the info to me,

Wut. You can't demand someone else advertise your pet issue then cry censorship when they express disinterest. Not trying to hide anything, go spread the word anywhere, in any way you wish, no one’s stopping you. And post here as you like, including starting a thread. You asked us to put your issue at the top of the bread, and we don’t put any singular topics at the top of the bread. To argue how important your particular issue is to miss the point. We share space and don't jostle for highest ranking topic anymore than we argue for highest ranking anon.

>>3307406

>arguing against any addition to the bread

Not at all. I'm arguing against putting it at the top of the bread.

We add stuff to the bread all the time. Make a thread and add it to the bread in the War Room, that's how we do it. I don't understand the problem.

>>3307485

>the only anon that is arguing against it being in the dough at all.

Ffs. Can you read? That's NOT my argument.

I was arguing that it not be at the TOP of the bread, that's all. Beyond that, I was giving advice as to HOW to include it in the bread, not trying to keep it out.

>nobody said at the top of the dough either.

Wrong. See this post:

>>3306685 lb

>But I still feel that the visual at the top of every bread would be much higher impact.

But I trust bakers will handle it fine, I'm going to bed.

>>3307271

Hope you get a relief baker soon, fren.

I stayed up waaaayyyy past bedtime

but Daybaker said would be on to relieve

wee hours baker in the early AM

so I figured I could sleep in.

Got lots of IRL I need to deal with anyway,

should pry myself away from QR tomorrow

(best laid plans, we'll see kek).

Have a great night, night crew!