What does anon consider a validation of contact?

1 Flashing lights

2 Booms

1. Dream experiences

2. Trance/meditative experiences

5 Physical exchanges

What would constitute consenus and then acceptable inquiry in various 'meta' phenomena?

Mass movements don't seem to happen on individual conscious levels.

What is the ideal which is projected forward to potientate the process?

Seriously, if ones own experiences justify the process of seeking further, what use is recognition or even acceptance of your very experience. It seems self defeating.

>>3609148

I look at the development of choice as being the primary concern. I can appreciate collective awareness enabling more open contact.

The zeal of some to acheive it seems to overshadow the real focus of humanity onto

itself.

Back in 2012, bunch of channelers were talking about a 'split'. IMHO, the tension created by proving experiences, once released will pretty much bisect a larger shared reality. The whole post disclosure thing, I guess. There's apparent gradients of reality people operate on. At this point media attention… I dont think its gonna cha ge much. Albeit the benefit of experiencer recognition will have an ordering effect to positive reality.

'Disclosure' seems to be about a large section of the population accepting there is something they dont understand (because they won't).

I feel I can comfortably say the forms of sexual attraction of humanity are not generally shared among ETs. They operate with a partial melded mind. People generally aren't so willing to frame things like such.

I'll review the breads. Lets not forget the ordering effect of experiencers already has a great effect on what some consider 'disclosure'

>>3609984

How do you classify experiencers?

It seems the scope of genectic alterations should the main criteria. Although the effects of contact have other perculations, this is the easiest.

Mainly, you have those with genectic predispositions; born with them. Then you have those who were altered while already incarnate.

Then you have a function of awareness of their genectic potential. You have organic awareness based on normative development. You have tramautic development and sub associational development.

ETs in the last two are interested parties, most especially the third.

Alterations occur: unconsciously, sub-consciously and consciously.

Between two populations successive generations bleds the genetic stock. Consider alterations as adaptations. Consider navigating a different type of environment (psychic, at least).

Anon, waiting for the scientific research after periphreal collective consenus will be what causes the domino effect.

All the demagogues are really just a show.

>>3613681

Its interesting people with no prior contact would seek to get involved. Then misunderstanding the phenomena seems a matter of course.

My contact started with semi-conscious and nonconsensual genectic alterations. If you imagine playing a piano, but you are the piano and someone's playing it you might begin to understand.

Subsequent OBE's.

Painfullly attempting to understand what happened.

Physicl craft sighting.

Being mental unstable

Physical contact.

Learning to assimilate unwanted new perceptions.

Understanding you're now at variant with how most people think.

I guess ignorance is bliss.