>>3631381

There are so many different types of IQ tests starting from a tradition of Binet & military testing which spans back over a 100 yrs, and that's of what we know - fr cabal/elite history: there is prob a lot more to the story. The topic is controversial even in those circles. However, in gifted intelligence, learners are identified in a certain area, (verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, etc. and many states are expanding to include different areas of giftedness youth can be identified in).

The 'how to make a perfect mind-controlled slave" fr Springmeier & Wheeler talks about IQ testing done at an extremely early age (I'd REALLY like to know what test they used - the ones school psychologists have had over the years are prob some normie version). They use the results of that test to develop programming for enhancing certain skills. From the results in certain subsets of the test.

If you look at CogAT, a particular type of cognitive test administered in K-12 public skills there are 3 areas of intelligence assessed: logical-mathematical, verbal, nonverbal (visual-spatial).

History of how we look at and assess IQ disagrees w/your assertion. Even Cabal/bloodline history.

>>3631381

This is a pretty good book on the history of conceptualizing, defining, measuring "IQ":

https://archive.org/details/intelligencemen00raym

It is a controversial history. The parts we know of. I recall one part of the book a person reporting on findings in his research aroused the anger/hatred so much that his presentation to a college was cancelled over death threats.

The origin of the terms idiot and imbecile are also mentioned.

>>3631593

Kek.

And they have a terrible memory.

>>3631764

It was my kinesthetic kleptomaniac ability in stealing the dank memes from the bombastic meme makers. I dun knot hav tha visule spashel sckills layk theyem.