Anonymous ID: 92ca7d Oct. 29, 2018, 12:41 p.m. No.3653864   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3653597

>>3653695

Q linked to his twatter

is the guy a famefag, probably, is the guy a normie, probably

his picture is significant nonetheless

The picture will be the signifier

the pic will force the Q, and the Q will be answered with echoes

reread the crumbs, I'm looking at this without bias, you seem not to be

Anonymous ID: 92ca7d Oct. 29, 2018, 12:51 p.m. No.3653987   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4060

>>3653635

>>3653514

>>3653720

>>3653924

just think about this:

 

>Important moment in time

POTUS is directly acknowledging Q (signing as Q+)

>The picture will be the signifier

Your picture's signing on the back is the signifier of Q+ being real

>The signifier will 'force' the Q

POTUS signing that will force people to ask "Is Q/Q+ real?" (which is "the Q")

>The Q will be answered (( (WWG1WGA)))

POTUS answered it, using the echoes around + to imply he is Q+

 

this is a big confirmation anon

just remember, THERE ARE SHILLS SHILLING AGAINST THIS, but anons are by nature skeptical, and as much help you can provide in further establishing its authenticity would help a lot

THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS

Anonymous ID: 92ca7d Oct. 29, 2018, 12:56 p.m. No.3654055   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4222

>>3654033

I doubt it

anons were debating last night, the echoes seem to be Q's comm for a coincidence or a literal echo though history not to jewish subversion

plus + = Soros, ++ = Roths; +++ = SA

Anonymous ID: 92ca7d Oct. 29, 2018, 12:57 p.m. No.3654084   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3654060

thats what I think, anons are formulating theories based on the crumb in my post and the pic the anon posted

It is for Q to confirm/deny, of course