Anonymous ID: c14b02 Oct. 29, 2018, 12:10 p.m. No.3653532   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3548 >>3612

>>3652725

Wray is very specific in how he speaks.

I saw it when he was questioned by Congress.

It's lawyerly.

He said it was not a hoax.

But he also said the bombs did not work.

Resolve.

When you are attempting to talk about simulations the language gets very tricky.

We ran into that with people calling 9/11 a "hoax"

That word "hoax" triggers people.

As if it wasn't real. Since everyone experienced it themselves.

So we had to think of new language to be understood.

"False Flag" imples a warfare technique used to trigger a war; So, that work is not completely correct when you are trying to talk about an on-going Propaganda GLADIO-x campaign.

I learned from reading a book on Logic that "NOT" word is very confusion to people.. They can't picture a "NOT" and that gets in the way of comprehension.

So "no planes" - there's an implicit block there to understandin built in that phrase. No one can visualize that.

So HOAX is the wrong word to use for what happened. Perhaps "Hoax" has a legal definition that was not appropriate for the description of this event.

Perhaps Wray is proscribed by law and by his supervisor RR from telling the public about a Propaganda event aided itself by some members of the SES . US gov. Contractors. FBI , who knows?

So I didn't feel the denial of "Hoax" meant the same thing as other people assumed.

And of course with misdirection the speakers knows they will be mis-understood, and that's why they phrase it the way they do.