Anons, just saying. Q posted about House - Senate mirror before Trump tweeted about it. A very clear Q proof this time.

>>3780830

We did. And look how well POTUS tweet correlates with Q's post before the tweet. (see attached picture)

>>3780880

Yep. Goodbye, faggot. I know you'll come back, when it happens. Until then, bye.

Holy shit. Shilling Level Con is definitely 5 this time. Crazy. Most idiots here are still blinded by MSM. POTUS actually gained +5 seats in Senate; I don't remember this happening in any mid-term election.

>>3780758

>>3780771

Yeah, faggots. What you don't get though is, that even that prediction is not accurate at all. In fact, it's likely going to be 55-45.

I still don't buy the House was left to Dems intentionally narrative. Doesn't make sense. I either call voter fraud or our movement isn't that big as we believed, which I highly doubt since all our rallies were ten times bigger than Obama's.

>>3781203

1. Noted. Maybe Trump is telling us actually that Q is not Trump, but in fact the "17 angry democrats". Would make sense.

>>3781190

That's indeed a very good post.

Baker, this should be

NOTABLE

>>3780593

>>3781248

I don't know if any anon cares what I am about to say, but no anon ever asked whether we would like the plan or not. I remember Q hinting to such moments. Will this split the movement?