Anonymous ID: c63186 Nov. 7, 2018, 1:54 p.m. No.3788523   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3788380

>Some say they have the best hackers in their cyber warfare division?

The North Koreans did for a long time, actually. China has just taken the "full on infiltration" route. You have to understand, that nifty little security camera you got in your house? It runs on a very basic Linux distro. 5 Minutes after activation, it starts pinging home.

 

Right now, there's a whole team of "hackersZZ11eleventy1!!" on the opposite side of the globe that can see just about every thing and everyone in your safe neighborhood. The reason they can is because everyone picked up one of those nifty 150 camera sets from Wally World to make them feel "safer".

 

If you don't believe me, check your router. If they can hack a sub, which they did, just imagine what all your appliances are doing right now.

Anonymous ID: c63186 Nov. 7, 2018, 1:57 p.m. No.3788604   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3788460

>>3788510

And what, exactly, does RM have in his stash of shit?

 

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📁

Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)

Cohen raid by FBI?

Public context: re: payment to Stormy Daniels?

SC & FBI raided POTUS’ attorney to pull Stormy Daniels payment info?

RR signed off?

What other docs were collected?

How many places raided?

Raid on the President of the United States’ attorney for payment details re: private case re: Stormy Daniels?

Think logically.

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?

Who has everything?

Methods which info collected/ obtained?

Admissible in the court of law?

Insert Rudy.

First public statement.

“It shouldn’t take more than “a week or two” to come to a resolution on the probe.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/20/rudy-to-rescue-giuliani-vows-to-wrap-up-mueller-probe.html📁

Think resignations.

Who has the POWER?

If POTUS was in a weakened position (about to be impeached/indicted) would ‘they’ resign?

Why are we here?

Public forum.

World watching.

Sharing of intel to bad actors?

Purpose?

>Whitaker reveal

Not confirming SC is on /team/.

Question everything.

Timing important.

Planned?

Q

Anonymous ID: c63186 Nov. 7, 2018, 2:05 p.m. No.3788768   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3788711

>>3788711

Not true if you count the "Inconclusive". Those are tactical stalemates. If it's not a loss, it's a win. Anything that rattles your opponent is a win. Like Sessions quitting or Whitaker taking over for RR.

Anonymous ID: c63186 Nov. 7, 2018, 2:18 p.m. No.3789049   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3788977

 

Q, how is the 1917 revolution, carried out by Bolsheviks who were predominantly of a particular "Semitic" persuasion, and the happenings of today supposed to not be "not a coincidence", and a "good" thing to what we're doing here?

 

Soviet Russia was a bad, bad thing.

Case in point:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag